The mayor or some similar official was interviewed on one of the news clips. She said their hands were tied before, but now that it's an imminent public safety hazard, they can do what's necessary and bill the owner.This situation may take a long time to resolve. The building owner is quite litigious and will oppose any attempt by the city to demolish the structure. And he doesn't seem to have the assets or the inclination to fix the building either.
Yeah, I saw that, too. Cities and counties have pretty extensive rights when something is clearly hazardous.The mayor or some similar official was interviewed on one of the news clips. She said their hands were tied before, but now that it's an imminent public safety hazard, they can do what's necessary and bill the owner.
Yeah, I saw that, too. Cities and counties have pretty extensive rights when something is clearly hazardous.
I think that owner is going to come out on the short end of the stick. At the end of all this I think it is likely he'll lose that property entirely, seized for unpaid taxes and repair/demolition bills, which he won't pay, either.
He can tie up the bills in courts but with an imminent hazard, he can't really tie up evaluation and repair or demolition. His lawyers can try, but it isn't likely a court is going to stay a city from remediating a clearly imminent hazard to the public safety. It may be years before it is all sorted out legally, and Albany isn't going to get reimbursed any time soon (if ever), but all that will be after the fact. The city will be able to take action since the building is now shedding large chunks of concrete (which it wasn't before, or not noticeably).He likely will, but he can also tie it up in courts and drag this drama out and make it tough on everybody. He doesn't strike one as the compromising type.
Depends on how deep his pockets are.He likely will, but he can also tie it up in courts and drag this drama out and make it tough on everybody. He doesn't strike one as the compromising type.
My malware blocker says the map includes a trojan and won't let it load.The linked map provides a good overview of the rail lines in the Albany region. Albany Rail Map
If the bus bridge is that quick maybe they should continue with the bus bridge for the EA and use the complex diversion only for the LSL and ML.In Sunday, I tracked 290. It was 10 minutes late into Saratoga, and makeup train was 20 late out of Rensselaer.
I am 290 right now. We left Burlington 10 minutes late. 26 passengers boarded there.
The latst time I departed Burlington on a train was July 1976 for Rutland on board former LIRR P54 coaches of Steamtown's.
Then again, it is possible that the bus would be faster from Burlington too. So we should be careful about how far we take itConductor already said bus from Saratoga is faster than the train.
I guess a good portion of the run will be at restricted speed, correct?So the Amtrak qualification runs have taken place yesterday, and there will be more before the detour is put into effect.
Rumor has it that Amtrak trains will make SDY and then proceed to South Schenectady Yard from where it will reverse on the Carmen Branch to the Selkirk Branch, then move forward on it to the Post Road Junction and reverse from there into ALB. It will probably add a couple of hours to the overall time between ALB and SDY, but probably less than the time taken by the bus bridge. And of course it will be a more convenient single seat ride.
Yes. And clearly the bus bridge will be quicker than the diversion for Regional trains. So the diversion might make sense only for the LSL and perhaps the ML. We'll have to wait and see how this unfolds.I guess a good portion of the run will be at restricted speed, correct?
I’m booked on 49 (8/3) out of NYP. So, I will attempt to describe how the bus bridge experience is from my personal point-of-view. I’ll try to add a picture or two as well.
I did a topomap distance of the proposed diversion route and came up with just over 47 miles station to station between Schenectady (SDY) to Albany (ALB). At 30mph that would be about 90 minutes running time. Add 10 minutes each for the three changes in direction, we're up to two hours. Add another hour of slop because it is Amtrak and CSX (imprecision railroading), and we're up to three hours from leaving SDY to arriving at ALB, and vice versa. The normal route SDY - ALB is 18 miles and is scheduled at 27 minutes. My guess: 2 to 2-1/2 hours delay using the diversion route. However, rare mileage is worth something.Yes. And clearly the bus bridge will be quicker than the diversion for Regional trains. So the diversion might make sense only for the LSL and perhaps the ML. We'll have to wait and see how this unfolds.
Train 290 got to Saratoga on time.I took the VTL bus northbound on Friday. It lost a half hour north of Rutland with US7 congestion and repaving.
Enter your email address to join: