https://pix11.com/news/local-news/m...s-masked-man-out-of-manhattan-subway-station/
#Courtesy, Professionalism, and Respect
#Courtesy, Professionalism, and Respect
https://pix11.com/news/local-news/m...s-masked-man-out-of-manhattan-subway-station/
#Courtesy, Professionalism, and Respect
Ah, so because a customer asked the people they are paying to employ through fares and taxes to follow their own rules, they were wrong? And that makes it okay to assualt that customer by grabbing their shirt and shoving them? Hilarious. The announcements in stations and trains to wear a mask get annoying because they play so often. There's signage everywhere. It's in the MTA's twitter name.The video doesn’t show both sides of what happened so there are unanswered questions. If cops were alone and not near the person who was walking by, the cops were in the right if the person just approached the cops for not wearing masks.
If he got off the train and cops were right next to him that would be a different issue. Wearing masks is really for when someone is in close proximity to another. We don’t need or want 100% enforcement where a train is empty and you go maskless and get fined or arrested. There has to be flexibility.
I think the rule said they had to be masked when interfacing with the public. To me, that would include anytime they were out on the platform. If they want to take them off when they're in their squad car, or in some area not open to the public, that's fine.The video doesn’t show both sides of what happened so there are unanswered questions. If cops were alone and not near the person who was walking by, the cops were in the right if the person just approached the cops for not wearing masks.
If he got off the train and cops were right next to him that would be a different issue. Wearing masks is really for when someone is in close proximity to another. We don’t need or want 100% enforcement where a train is empty and you go maskless and get fined or arrested. There has to be flexibility.
Yeah, no. That's not how any of this works. The mask mandate means "wear the damn mask".The video doesn’t show both sides of what happened so there are unanswered questions. If cops were alone and not near the person who was walking by, the cops were in the right if the person just approached the cops for not wearing masks.
If he got off the train and cops were right next to him that would be a different issue. Wearing masks is really for when someone is in close proximity to another. We don’t need or want 100% enforcement where a train is empty and you go maskless and get fined or arrested. There has to be flexibility.
hahahaha clearly you don't know the mafia that is the NYPD. But I agree.I hope they get severely reprimanded if not fired and are forced to wear masks.
Ah, so because a customer asked the people they are paying to employ through fares and taxes to follow their own rules, they were wrong? And that makes it okay to assualt that customer by grabbing their shirt and shoving them? Hilarious. The announcements in stations and trains to wear a mask get annoying because they play so often. There's signage everywhere. It's in the MTA's twitter name.
You mean the officers who violated city regulations on wearing masks? Had they been wearing masks as required or had they immediately put on their masks before an supposed longer altercation or before any escalation, there likely would have been a different outcome. Too many police officers contribute to the problem instead of calmly resolving it no matter how much in the wrong they are. I've seen it over and over again, even while volunteering with the local sheriff's department. They suffer from TGS - Tough Guy Syndrome.Lots of assumptions here.
Do we know that the officers grabbed the guy just because he politely asked them to put on a mask? Or had there been some longer altercation or escalation?
It doesn't have to result in a fall or injury for it to be assault. It's assault.I don't think that being pushed out through an exit constitutes assault unless the push force knocked the person down, so the article title is a bit inflammatory, however, they definitely should have been wearing masks. Although I don't live in a place with subways, when the ones I have been in are not wide open spaces by any means. A lot of police are currently acting like bullies by threatening cities where they are attempting to implement vaccine mandates and since many people who are against vaccines are also against wearing masks, I wouldn't be surprised if these two are in the anti-mask/vaccine camp. But I do also agree that it can be difficult to understand someone speaking through a mask. Lots of lost consonants.
No, everyone is supposed to wear masks while on trains and inside enclosed stations. AT. ALL. TIMES. That is the rule. The cops were not in the right in any part of this. Also, COVID can linger in the air in an enclosed space for quite a while depending on the ventilation. So yeah, being mask-less in an empty train car should result in a fine.The video doesn’t show both sides of what happened so there are unanswered questions. If cops were alone and not near the person who was walking by, the cops were in the right if the person just approached the cops for not wearing masks.
If he got off the train and cops were right next to him that would be a different issue. Wearing masks is really for when someone is in close proximity to another. We don’t need or want 100% enforcement where a train is empty and you go maskless and get fined or arrested. There has to be flexibility.
You mean the officers who violated city regulations on wearing masks? Had they been wearing masks as required or had they immediately put on their masks before an supposed longer altercation or before any escalation, there likely would have been a different outcome. Too many police officers contribute to the problem instead of calmly resolving it no matter how much in the wrong they are. I've seen it over and over again, even while volunteering with the local sheriff's department. They suffer from TGS - Tough Guy Syndrome.
Per nyc.gov: "All Police Officers, Detectives, Sergeants and Lieutenants regularly assigned to perform patrol duties throughout the city are equipped with body-worn cameras." So the body cameras should have told the complete story. But has NYPD made a statement that the body cameras they are supposed to be using show a different story?
Heck, you can just accidentally **touch** somebody, and it can be considered "assault."It doesn't have to result in a fall or injury for it to be assault. It's assault.
Moreover, it would appear that there can be two offenses if the officer lacked justification for what he did, assault and batteryHeck, you can just accidentally **touch** somebody, and it can be considered "assault."
I don't think that being pushed out through an exit constitutes assault unless the push force knocked the person down, so the article title is a bit inflammatory,
Where I live pushing someone against their will would normally be considered assault but police enjoy qualified immunity which means they live by different set of rules on duty. Briefly touching someone by legitimate accident is not normally considered assault but it could still get you fired in an at-will state like mine.Heck, you can just accidentally **touch** somebody, and it can be considered "assault."
I checked NY Penal Law. NY state law definitions of crimes differ substantially from the common-law meanings of the words.I don't think that being pushed out through an exit constitutes assault unless the push force knocked the person down,
Yeah, that's what I meant. I'm not sure what the legal definition of assault is; I was just stating my opinion as what a "normal" person might think when they hear the word assault. I think of being hit or pushed down. And then there's context. The same push force might knock certain people down, but not others or even most. Happily, this person did not get knocked down by the push force the police officer was exerting on him.Heck, you can just accidentally **touch** somebody, and it can be considered "assault."
Please correct me if I am wrong, but I believe the transit company is requiring all people to wear masks at indoor stations and on board trains. So they were required to, whether or not it's a law as they were on the premises.They are mandates - not law!
Enter your email address to join: