homersimpson101
Train Attendant
For example, it takes the Coast Starlight 12-14 hours to go from the SF Bay Area to Los Angeles. By contrast, driving that distance only takes 7 hours. Why?
Simply because the railway is usually a much older routing, that is limited by grades and curvature. Trains take longer to accelerate and decelerate than cars do. Some long distance trains are faster than cars...the SW Chief runs at 90mph for several long stretches...For example, it takes the Coast Starlight 12-14 hours to go from the SF Bay Area to Los Angeles. By contrast, driving that distance only takes 7 hours. Why?
What is the average speed of the Coast Starlight? Is it around 45 mph because I don't think they can run at 79 mph all the way?Simply because the railway is usually a much older routing, that is limited by grades and curvature. Trains take longer to accelerate and decelerate than cars do. Some long distance trains are faster than cars...the SW Chief runs at 90mph for several long stretches...
About 40 mph.What is the average speed of the Coast Starlight? Is it around 45 mph because I don't think they can run at 79 mph all the way?
The better question for the original poster might be: "Why aren't passenger trains as fast as they once were?"Interestingly, if you were to drive a similar route to the LSL, which takes around 20 hours, it was be about 15-1/2 hours. Driving to Boston is similar, but the train takes even longer.
While you can zippy do da by highway over Cuesta pass at 55 mph or better - - -The coast starlight travels through Cuesta Pass. There are steep grades and curves.
Back in those days railroads were competing with each other for business which doesn't happen today. Amtrak has no rail competition between Chicago and NYC so there's no imperative to even advocate for faster service, much less deliver it. Also, in the words of my late father who was an operations manager for the Pennsylvania Railroad during the mid-50's, "Heaven help you if you delayed the Broadway!" That fear also no longer exists.The better question for the original poster might be: "Why aren't passenger trains as fast as they once were?"
The all-time fastest Chicago to New York City train was the mid-'50's Broadway Limited ...
It did it in 15.5 hours, on a considerably longer route than you could drive it on today's I-80...
http://www.streamlinerschedules.com/concourse/track5/broadway195607.html
I might add that there was no freight interference with passenger rail trafficBack in those days railroads were competing with each other for business which doesn't happen today. Amtrak has no rail competition between Chicago and NYC so there's no imperative to even advocate for faster service, much less deliver it. Also, in the words of my late father who was an operations manager for the Pennsylvania Railroad during the mid-50's, "Heaven help you if you delayed the Broadway!" That fear also no longer exists.
Absolutely!Back in those days railroads were competing with each other for business which doesn't happen today. Amtrak has no rail competition between Chicago and NYC so there's no imperative to even advocate for faster service, much less deliver it. Also, in the words of my late father who was an operations manager for the Pennsylvania Railroad during the mid-50's, "Heaven help you if you delayed the Broadway!" That fear also no longer exists.
Reportedly when the City of Portland was launched, the UP president had a performance report on his desk each morning from the chief dispatcher.Absolutely!
I would imagine that on some roads, the first item the CEO would check on the "morning report", was the performance of their flagship train...
All true and also because trains make many more stops between than a car normally would.Simply because the railway is usually a much older routing, that is limited by grades and curvature. Trains take longer to accelerate and decelerate than cars do. Some long distance trains are faster than cars...the SW Chief runs at 90mph for several long stretches...
Except, the Auto Train...right?All true and also because trains make many more stops between than a car normally would.
Oh, I don't know. When I take a road trip, I need to stop every hour or so to use the restroom. Then there are traffic lights and such if you have to go off the freeway. On the other hand, I can drive curvy mountain highways, even the Pennsylvania Turnpike, at 60-70 mph, no problem.All true and also because trains make many more stops between than a car normally would.
Enter your email address to join: