Oops...and PA....Hey, you left out DE.I would guess the same... the "Silver's" carry more passengers to and from NY, NJ, & MD, then the Crescent, I believe...
Not sure about the Cardinal...
Oops...and PA....Hey, you left out DE.I would guess the same... the "Silver's" carry more passengers to and from NY, NJ, & MD, then the Crescent, I believe...
Not sure about the Cardinal...
Well, since many think DE is in PA .....Oops...and PA....Hey, you left out DE.I would guess the same... the "Silver's" carry more passengers to and from NY, NJ, & MD, then the Crescent, I believe...
Not sure about the Cardinal...
From ATL-NYP on July 10th and 11th, the price appears to be $129.20 via a Regional and $288.00 via an Acela.The layover of Crescent in WASH probably has the best ability to have an on time departure southbound from WASH. As well when any of the Crescent's sleepers needs to go to MIA that will be easy as well any V-2 diners to be attached to a southbound Meteor. Crescent Amfleets no problem servicing at Ivy City or Bear.
.
Crescent passengers are getting a bonus during this time as it appears that listed connections north of WASH are going to be on Acelas with what appears to be no fare difference. Someone needs to research that in more detail.
On another note the shortened or cancelled NEC regional trains may have their equipment added to other NEC trains so capacity may not be reduced ?
Is that Crescent BC to Acela BC ? And Crescent sleeper to Acela First ? Those are better comparsionss"brianpmcdonnell17"
From ATL-NYP on July 10th and 11th, the price appears to be $129.20 via a Regional and $288.00 via an Acela.
brianpmcdonnell17 said:Both are the cheapest fares available, so coach on the Crescent and Regional and business class on the Acela.
According to postings by Thirdrail, our resident Amtrak expert, WAS is barely able to turn one LD train, so there is no question of turning multiple ones there. As for why the Crescent, apparently you get the maximum advantage in terms of reduced traffic at Penn Station at the most critical times by removing it from Penn Station for the time being, while incurring the least inconvenience all around.I'm curious why the Crescent is the only train terminating/originating in DC, and not the Silvers/Cardinal. I'd imagine there's a reason, but that in particular piqued my interest as a one-time semi-frequent Crescent rider.
Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
19 might have a later departure time out of WAS so that would increase the margin of safety.The layover of Crescent in WASH probably has the best ability to have an on time departure southbound from WASH. As well when any of the Crescent's sleepers needs to go to MIA that will be easy as well any V-2 diners to be attached to a southbound Meteor. Crescent Amfleets no problem servicing at Ivy City or Bear.
.
I'm not sure if that is a bonus. I'd prefer a sleeper without a transfer..
Crescent passengers are getting a bonus during this time as it appears that listed connections north of WASH are going to be on Acelas with what appears to be no fare difference. Someone needs to research that in more detail.
That is the plan. The leftover equipment will be used on other trains.On another note the shortened or cancelled NEC regional trains may have their equipment added to other NEC trains so capacity may not be reduced ?
Now that's a rare bird. I wonder when was the last time Amtrak operated a train that was scheduled to either begin or end its trip in NWK?If you look hard enough, you'll notice three less Keystones operating between PHL-NYP-PHL and you'll see one should turn in NWK.
Actually turning a push-pull consist in Newark is a little bit easier now ever since the two pocket tracks were commissioned at Hudson/Rea.Now that's a rare bird. I wonder when was the last time Amtrak operated a train that was scheduled to either begin or end its trip in NWK?If you look hard enough, you'll notice three less Keystones operating between PHL-NYP-PHL and you'll see one should turn in NWK.
I assume that the baggage will be carried up on 92, which is an annoyance for many passengers. Would it be operationally possible to add a baggage car to 176 on the affected days? When I travel on this routing next month I plan to spend the day around NYC and go back to NYP around 7:30 to claim my bags and get an LIRR connection. Hopefully it works better than last time, when my luggage arrived in NYP the day before me. It was placed in the lost and found, where I assumed it would be. However, I was not told that it would not be open when I arrived on 64. Following this, the employee at lost and found insisted it was at the baggage claim area, where I checked and ended up filing a missing bag report. I returned to lost and found later, where they continued to deny that the bags were there despite the fact that I could see them behind the counter.I think linking 20 to 176 (along with 650's passengers at PHL) is a disaster waiting to happen. What is the backup plan if 20 is late? Are you putting them on 94? What happens to their luggage?? (Blank stares)
I had that thought as well. 94 is a train I avoid like the plague. ALWAYS, and I mean ALWAYS SRO. Last time I rode 94 I was on the Head end and getting off at PHL it was a mob scene for folks getting on and off.
I think linking 20 to 176 (along with 650's passengers at PHL) is a disaster waiting to happen. What is the backup plan if 20 is late? Are you putting them on 94? What happens to their luggage?? (Blank stares)
176 is a LYH-BOS train. In theory, they could add the bag when they swap the engines. However, that would mean the bag would have to stay until BOS. That probably wouldn't be the end of the world assuming there is a bag to to make the trip, but that adds one more car to the consist when there is already a limitation in Boston. You'd sacrifice coach seating for bag service on a train that is usually quite busy...without 20's or 650's passengers.I assume that the baggage will be carried up on 92, which is an annoyance for many passengers. Would it be operationally possible to add a baggage car to 176 on the affected days? When I travel on this routing next month I plan to spend the day around NYC and go back to NYP around 7:30 to claim my bags and get an LIRR connection. Hopefully it works better than last time, when my luggage arrived in NYP the day before me. It was placed in the lost and found, where I assumed it would be. However, I was not told that it would not be open when I arrived on 64. Following this, the employee at lost and found insisted it was at the baggage claim area, where I checked and ended up filing a missing bag report. I returned to lost and found later, where they continued to deny that the bags were there despite the fact that I could see them behind the counter.
Yes. Washington doesn't really have the room to store it during the day, so it'll be a same day turn in the S&I.Will the Crescent go from 4 to 3 consists during the truncation, there is plenty of time for same day turnaround in DC eliminating a trainset?
Pure speculation.Any idea what the extra Crescent set will be used for?
Nothing...LOLAny idea what the extra Crescent set will be used for?
Just for the sake of argument, where are you gonna get 35 or so Superliners to do that?Not that it will happen, but running the Crescent to and from WAS only, means it COULD be equipped with Superliners.
Ken
Enter your email address to join: