A great Viking. And one of the places he tried was Bosham. But he soon learned it was futile. lol.
Fare Buckets discussion 2023 Q4 - 2024
- Thread starter pennyk
- Start date
Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:
But remember if 40 car is dropped, the. Some rooms are needed for on board employees that used the dorm car.
That should not impact passengers already booked into the 32 car, assuming that car itself is not dropped.
Please consider another group of consumers who want to take the train but don't want to pay the exorbitant price for a roomette, etc. As a trial, why not have one car of a train be only for one passenger buying two adjacent coach seats and have that one passenger pay double fare ( still cheaper than a roomette.) This way if the train is an overnight one, that person can at least spread out. Might this be a compromise? Amtrak sells two seats for one person...the person gets less privacy than a roomette but more privacy than the standard one coach seat per person. Hasn't its time come? At least can't Amtrak try this out?
They could do that if only they'd start assigning seats when reservations were made (which they ought to do anyway. Their railroad predecessors managed it). Otherwise conductors would not enforce it and allow someone to take "your" other seat. Another restraint is they do not have enough coaches, either. The Seattle section of the Builder lost its badly needed second coach again in the middle of the summer, for example.
But yes, selling double coach seats would be cheaper, though coach seats are yield managed, too, and subject to the same economic laws. Allowing purchase of two coach seats per person would tend to raise average coach fares as it increases demand on the same supply. Note that high bucket coach fares are not particularly cheap, either. With the current equipment shortages that approach might backfire badly, drastically increasing coach fares for those lacking means and still needing to travel.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2005
- Messages
- 979
The real solution on prices/capacity restrictions is only going to come when current management is removed. The way things are now, even a new car order won’t change management philosophy. With potential board nominee Ron Battory last week saying in front of Congress that Anderson, Coscia and by default Gardner were being deceitful in the SWC trainoff saga of 2018 there might be light at the end of the tunnel. Until then expect fares to keep climbing and LD consists reduced.
Septa9739
Lead Service Attendant
I was looking to book a trip to the Midwest late in February this year (not President’s day weekend) and the fares from the East to Chicago are astronomical. A round trip on the LSL from NYP to CHI is over $400 for COACH. The Floridian is about $300. The Cardinal is the typical $180. The Cardinal is about where I remember it plus a hike or two, but the other two are more expensive than flying, which was never the case. Does someone maybe @niemi24s have some knowledge of what “good” East to CHI fares are these days? More seats should have caused lower fares, not higher.
west point
Engineer
Yet Floridian coach fares from Midwest to Florida fares for many days are in low $100s. Sleepers very high!
Last edited:
caravanman
Engineer
During January 2015, most LSL coach fares from NYP to Chicago, or reverse, are $93 single. Suddenly they shoot up to $216 single after the first week in February. Seems a bit odd? Maybe a glitch? That seems to be the price for all dates then going forward...
For travel between NYP and CHI all I can tell you is the fares I have found for the LSL and Cardinal which can be seen here: https://www.amtraktrains.com/threads/long-distance-train-coach-sleeper-fares-buckets.77062/page-7
Unfortunately for you, the only Coach fare posted is the "accommodation" fare for an additional adult in a sleeper. But the easiest way to search for the lowest Coach fare is to use this wonderful search tool: https://railforless.us/ Using it showed lowest fares of $93 for NYP to CHI in Coach on six days in the later half of February as shown below:
the higher fare is $219
Last edited:
I just ran February and March 2025 CHI-NYP on railsforless.us and got a consistent $93 on the LSL and Card and $162 for Floridian/NER in coach on all dates.
I ran NYP-CHI and got the same fare jump to $219 on February 3rd, but it stayed at $219 for the entire remainder of February and all of March for me. I didn't get the dips back to $93 in late February.
I find the direction based fare difference striking. I can come up only two possible explanations. One is that there is a significant difference in demand between westbound and eastbound. The other is that Amtrak yield managers have adjusted inventory allocation for 48, but not yet for 49. We are about five months out, smack in the middle of the 4-6 month out sweet spot that my empirical experience is they often reallocate inventory, at least for sleepers. We very well may see those fares drop in the near future if that is the case.
I ran NYP-CHI and got the same fare jump to $219 on February 3rd, but it stayed at $219 for the entire remainder of February and all of March for me. I didn't get the dips back to $93 in late February.
I find the direction based fare difference striking. I can come up only two possible explanations. One is that there is a significant difference in demand between westbound and eastbound. The other is that Amtrak yield managers have adjusted inventory allocation for 48, but not yet for 49. We are about five months out, smack in the middle of the 4-6 month out sweet spot that my empirical experience is they often reallocate inventory, at least for sleepers. We very well may see those fares drop in the near future if that is the case.
trimetbusfan
OBS Chief
Thanks for the new low buckets.
Last edited:
west point
Engineer
This sleeper situation is very confusing to this person. For a full single level sleeper, the median fares bucket seems to be 3 - 4 + times what a full coach brings in. Now if Amtrak would get all its single level sleeper in service and order more the revenue potential would seem very pro passenger. That probably means that the additional costs do not penalize the present bonus system. Realize that Amtrak got burned on the V-2 deliveries, but it should take the lessons learned and buy another 150 - 200 single level sleepers. That makes it possible to have 6 - 7 sleepers on each single level LD train with possibility that another single level train can be started. That IMO would be a DFW - Meridian -ATL - NYP round trip.
We have to wonder how many last many sleeper passengers would ride if space was able 1 - 7 days in advance at more reasonable fares. Of course, that means aggressive marking of the various routes and cut off cars on some routes especially the Crescent.
At present , it appears that last minute sleeper requests go no where due to presnt sell out. So many potential riders probably say "why even try"
We have to wonder how many last many sleeper passengers would ride if space was able 1 - 7 days in advance at more reasonable fares. Of course, that means aggressive marking of the various routes and cut off cars on some routes especially the Crescent.
At present , it appears that last minute sleeper requests go no where due to presnt sell out. So many potential riders probably say "why even try"
In August 2023, I discovered what I thought was the low bucket sleeper fare on 6 from EMY to Chicago about a week out. IIRC, it was around $670. When I got to San Francisco, I realized I had booked it for the wrong day. I had intended to spend one night in San Francisco, but I had it for the day after the day I wanted to leave. I went into the app to change it and got a roomette for $610, which was less than what I paid. I agree that finding such low fares is much more difficult now.
Fare on today's # 3 CHI-LAX about 10 minutes ago for a Bedroom is $2880.00. Is this a "bucket" fare config or just a random entry to see if any moron would actually pay that. I suspect I already know the answer to that--with all due respect. An outrageous fare like the one noted often reminds me of a day about 10 years ago departing Los Angeles Union Station when the onboard conductor sold two coach passengers the bedroom adjacent to mine LAX - CHI for $425.00 when the fare receipt for my bedroom had been booked and paid for several months earlier at full bucket $525.00.
Normal high bucket.
It's normal high bucket and that one single bedroom sleeper accommodation is the only sleeper accommodation of any type available on 3(15).
Today's 4 is sold out entirely in sleepers.
That 3 is going out with just one empty room of any type and 4 is entirely sold out signifies that that yield management is dialed in correctly. Yield management done properly requires a little bit of unsold inventory, consistent sell outs indicate that high bucket pricing is too low and potential revenue is being lost.
I recall when I could do a round trip on the Canadian between Vancouver and Banff in a roomette for $110 CAD. While that was more than 10 years ago, pricing from decade ago or more is wholly immaterial to today, other than in fond fantasy.
Prices for a scarce "luxury" commodity whose supply does not meet demand, which a sleeper bedroom is, are going to be high in a market economy. As I have said many times, that it is a lousy value proposition is immaterial as long as there are people who take it, which there apparently are.
Last edited:
Thanks, zephyr17, for the prompt reply to my inquiry. I totally agree with your statements and sentiment. I guess I am grieving for myself a little. It has taken until now for me to stop travelling by rail. This railfan (me) who just had his 77th birthday; over a quarter of a million miles as a rail passenger (many miles since Amtrak): who would 3 or 4 or 5 times a year get on the Crescent ATN-WAS or Silvers DLD-WAS just to ride in the sleepers. I can no longer justify the outrageous sleeper fares "just to ride". Indeed, that "fond fantasy" is done. Again, thanks again for your attention to my inquiry!
Welcome to the Club from a 50 year+ Amtrak Rider!
That $2880 Bedroom high bucket fare you found is not the highest among all the LD routes. There are three others that are about $400 more and they can be seen here: https://www.amtraktrains.com/threads/long-distance-train-coach-sleeper-fares-buckets.77062/page-7
Thanks for pointing me to that link. I am not sure that finding a fare higher than the one I noted does anything but increase my cynicism of Amtrak's fare structure and their operations in general. I have never fully understood the fare bucket--now I really guess I don't even want to. My problem--and I fully acknowledge it IS my problem--is trying to wrap my head around the fact that a product (an Amtrak Superliner bedroom with transportation CHI-LAX) can be priced 600%-700% higher than it was 10 years ago. It is the exact same product.
My earliest fare bucket chart was about 9 years ago and it shows a high bucket Bedroom fare on the SWC (or TE) of $135 + $1631 = $1766 which is. . .
. . .only up 63% to todays $2880. Back then the total fare for one adult was the sum of the $135 Saver Fare and the $1631 accommodation fare for that $1766 total.
But maybe you were comparing todays high bucket of $2880 to a low bucket fare of $823 which increases the fare jump to only 250%.
Could also be the fares ten years ago (one year earlier than in the above chart) were much much lower. Can't say for sure.
. . .only up 63% to todays $2880. Back then the total fare for one adult was the sum of the $135 Saver Fare and the $1631 accommodation fare for that $1766 total.
But maybe you were comparing todays high bucket of $2880 to a low bucket fare of $823 which increases the fare jump to only 250%.
Could also be the fares ten years ago (one year earlier than in the above chart) were much much lower. Can't say for sure.
Last edited:
As one who used to regularly ride on the Texas Eagle to CHI and the Eagle/Sunset to LAX, ( and most other LD Trains)the current Room charges are right around 10 times Higher, plus the Time Keeping was Much Better, and generally so we're the Crews, the Food and the Equipment!
For Example I could ride AUS- CHI or AUS-LAx in a Roomette for around $120 Total,( Rail Fare + Room Charges) plus AGR Reward Trips under the Zone System were Really a Bargain , especially the "Loophole" Trips!
"..Those were the days my friend, I thought they'd never end.."
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2018
- Messages
- 124
I, too, grieve for myself a little about how the high sleeper fares are making my Amtrak trips less frequent. 
But, in a market economy, the value (price) of any item or service is simply what someone is willing to pay. I can say there is no value for me or that the price is too high for me, but if someone else is willing to pay the fare then they have determined that the value is there for them. There is nothing wrong or broken with Amtrak's yield management system - in fact by all appearances it is working quite well to maximize revenue from a very limited supply.
The crux of the problem is that sleeper supply is almost comically low and is consistently lagging demand. It's unclear how deep the demand is, but it is evident that the price elasticity for sleepers is very low at current capacities (meaning that as price goes up or down the demand does not fluctuate all that much). The supply pinch might be slightly eased if Amtrak can get more Superliner's fixed (or reassigned from axle count duty), but there won't be any meaningful improvement until/unless the next-gen bi-level equipment goes into service (5-10 years).
But, in a market economy, the value (price) of any item or service is simply what someone is willing to pay. I can say there is no value for me or that the price is too high for me, but if someone else is willing to pay the fare then they have determined that the value is there for them. There is nothing wrong or broken with Amtrak's yield management system - in fact by all appearances it is working quite well to maximize revenue from a very limited supply. The crux of the problem is that sleeper supply is almost comically low and is consistently lagging demand. It's unclear how deep the demand is, but it is evident that the price elasticity for sleepers is very low at current capacities (meaning that as price goes up or down the demand does not fluctuate all that much). The supply pinch might be slightly eased if Amtrak can get more Superliner's fixed (or reassigned from axle count duty), but there won't be any meaningful improvement until/unless the next-gen bi-level equipment goes into service (5-10 years).
