jis
Permanent Way Inspector
Staff member
Administator
Moderator
AU Supporting Member
Gathering Team Member
That will depend on how much upgrading they doHow would that effect travel times?
That will depend on how much upgrading they doHow would that effect travel times?
Okay, to the same level as the current New Haven-Boston section is?That will depend on how much upgrading they do
Alternatively, they could just upgrade the Inland Route including electrification and acquisition from CSX of the Worcester - Springfield segment, and get a full fledged second route to run as many trains as they wish. State of Connecticut and Massachusetts would have to spearhead the effort. Maybe it will happen sooner rather than later.
But there are fewer Mariners than McMansion owners, and they basically scotched the idea of a bypass that was presented to Connecticut more than once, each time, overwhelmingly, even though most of it was going to be in a tunnel deep under their McMansions. The difficulty in finding any alternate routing through Connecticut is well known and nothing has changed.Should have used the drawbridge opening augment to build the bypass. Probably would have garnered a lot of support from the mariners I would think.
BTW - is there any seasonality to the restrictions? I would guess they are much more necessary during the summer sailing months.
The reason used to be Conrail and then it is CSX now.I personally have always wondered why the inland route isn’t more utilized. I’d be curious to study the history of why this became the case. A train from Boston to Hartford could be as useful as a train from Boston to Providence/New London.
Hartford’s sad state could also be improved with direct reliable service to Boston.
The reason used to be Conrail and then it is CSX now.
It will get fixed only after MassDOT manages get CSX out of the Worcester - Springfield segment.
It is pretty unbelievable that MBTA doesn’t go to Springfield.
Enter your email address to join: