jis
Permanent Way Inspector
Staff member
Administator
Moderator
AU Supporting Member
Gathering Team Member
The height of the fruit will depend on what the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is willing to fund come the end of the initial Federal funding period. None of these routes will be funded in perpetuity by the Feds. They all become state funded PRIIA 209 routes after the initial establishment period.I think once the Scranton to NYP service is running, it would make sense to talk about BOS. That just seems easy(ish). Then I think Scranton to HAR would be the next relatively low hanging fruit. There is relative little NS traffic on the line (I think 6-8 per day) but infrastructure may be an issue. That Corridor would never support more than two or three round trips per day. Binghamton is pretty much the same story, but the lure of the NYC market will make it more appealing. Scranton to PHL is an ugly proposition. Travel times were historically fairly ugly. There is significant ROW disruption in Bucks and Montgomery Counties. SEPTA will repay AMTRAK‘s (sometimes very unfair) dispatching practices as AMTRAK tries to operate express over the congested with local service ex-Reading trunk from Jenkintown-Wyncote to Center City, although this could be mitigated by restoring the branch from Lansdale to Norristown and using infrastructure necessary for the Reading service to reach the NEC. Problems aside PHL-Scranton could be a very busy corridor, especially Allentown to PHL. It’s a question of dollars and cents.
Consequently if SEPTA chooses to clobber these trains it would not be Amtrak they would be clobbering. It would be PennDOT, and guess where SEPTA gets its funding from
That is of course not to say that bureaucracies do not look for opportunities to cause damage to themselves purely out of spite. The New York Tri-State area is replete with examples of such. Of course the taxpayers get to fund all that nonsense as time goes on.
Last edited: