As a railfan, I had always wanted to work for Amtrak in some capacity since the 1970's--applied on occasion but never really followed it up. Now I am too old. Darn. C'est la vie.
Why do you think they're interesting?Interesting job postings. Aug 20th.
Job Matches:
Asst Superintendent Ops - 90237855 - Washington - Washington, District of Columbia, US, 20002
Asst Superintendent Ops - 90106388 - Chicago - Chicago, Illinois, US, 60661
Lead Service Attendants - Oakland, CA - Oakland, California
Lead Service Attendants - Washington, DC - Washington, District of Columbia
Train Attendants - Washington, DC - Washington, District of Columbia
Lead Service Attendants - 90342788 - Chicago, IL - Chicago, Illinois, US, 60607
Train Attendants - 90342823 - Ft Worth, TX - Ft Worth, Texas, US, 76102
Block Operator - 90341208 - New York, NY - New York, New York, US, 10001
The Train Attendants Openings in Ft Worth is Interesting to me since the Eaglete and Heartland Flyer are serviced there.Interesting job postings. Aug 20th.
Job Matches:
Asst Superintendent Ops - 90237855 - Washington - Washington, District of Columbia, US, 20002
Asst Superintendent Ops - 90106388 - Chicago - Chicago, Illinois, US, 60661
Lead Service Attendants - Oakland, CA - Oakland, California
Lead Service Attendants - Washington, DC - Washington, District of Columbia
Train Attendants - Washington, DC - Washington, District of Columbia
Lead Service Attendants - 90342788 - Chicago, IL - Chicago, Illinois, US, 60607
Train Attendants - 90342823 - Ft Worth, TX - Ft Worth, Texas, US, 76102
Block Operator - 90341208 - New York, NY - New York, New York, US, 10001
That about says it all!!They had a job fare up here in Rensselaer, NY. They posted the notice on Tuesday 16th for a fare on Wednesday 17th. It also was by inviting only. So no I don’t think this is going to help them.
Legally they have to. In practice over 50 and your going to have a hard time starting/getting a new job. My few attempt are low effort, so my age is probably not the reason.Do they hire people over 40, 50, 60...?
The notice that was posted on the 16th was more of a reminder post. The posting for that job fair went up in June.They had a job fare up here in Rensselaer, NY. They posted the notice on Tuesday 16th for a fare on Wednesday 17th. It also was by inviting only. So no I don’t think this is going to help them.
It's more like $22 and change an hour. HOWEVER.... Keep in mind that OBS works a wide variety of hours. My trips on the EB paid 70 hours R/T BEFORE extra time. It wasn't uncommon for me to rack up 80 hours in one R/T. Also factor in that OBS employees will routinely receive tips in the Diner and Sleepers. Trust me.... OBS employees are paid fairly, but their is always room for improvement.Also, OBS starts at $21/hour?!? What a joke!
Yes. Frequently.Do they hire people over 40, 50, 60...?
Unfortunately most current OBS employees would find that less appealing.Perhaps the solution for the LD trains in the west is to split the OBS crew shifts so that each crew only works one night on the route and gets to return to home base every second day, with the third day in the cycle off.
Unfortunately most current OBS employees would find that less appealing.
He's a Retired Amtrak LD OBS and most old timers like their Schedules, they bid them with Seniority, and enjoy working with the same people as part of a Team.Why do you think so ?
I applaud your creative thinking, however, realistically speaking it would be 3 (or 4) days on the road and probably 2 days off. Working this type of schedule, you spend the first day off recovering from your work thus you really only have one day off before you leave home again.Why do you think so ?
While I agree with you, Amtrak might not have that latitude, since they are governed by FRA regs. The armed forces may have more leeway in setting their recruiting standards.Regarding the issue of Amtrak having trouble with applicants failing their drug tests. Amtrak might want to consider following the lead of the US Air Force and US. Space Force:
https://www.militarytimes.com/news/...-let-in-applicants-who-test-positive-for-thc/
Apparently, the other services have been giving waivers for some time to people who test positive for THC. Typically, the applicant has to wait 90 days and get retested.
A money quote from the article:
"Amid that debate, Rand Corp. has argued that Army recruits with histories of low-level marijuana use perform on par with other soldiers."
I'm taking a trip to CHI to WAS and plan on tipping $20 each way no matter how the services is because that is a hard job. I don't know if i'm suppose to tip the people on the ACELA train going to New York City. I'm doing a trip to LAX next march and plan to do $20 each day.Thanks for this info. What are folks thoughts on tips for these OBS? I want to make sure I tip in alignment with expectations I guess. Thx!
I'd call you very generous.I'm taking a trip to CHI to WAS and plan on tipping $20 each way no matter how the services is because that is a hard job. I don't know if i'm suppose to tip the people on the ACELA train going to New York City. I'm doing a trip to LAX next march and plan to do $20 each day.
On the Acela there is no one to tip other than the cafe attendant or first class attendant if doing first.I'm taking a trip to CHI to WAS and plan on tipping $20 each way no matter how the services is because that is a hard job. I don't know if i'm suppose to tip the people on the ACELA train going to New York City. I'm doing a trip to LAX next march and plan to do $20 each day.
Saw this in my LinkedIn feed, which might explain why there's so much understaffing.
View attachment 30535
The pool of working aged people is shrinking, shrinking, shrinking. If companies expect to be able to hire people, they're going to have to treat them a lot better than they have in the past.
Indeed! The pool was growing, growing, growing until 2020. It is only in the last year and a half that it appears to have shrunk very marginally. Note that the curve in the diagram is the first derivative of working age population size, not the working age population size.If I’m reading that graph correctly, the pool of working aged people isn’t really shrinking. It’s just stayed flat over the couple of years instead of a +0.25 to 0.5% growth over the previous decade.
Essentially, the labor pool today is the same size it was in early 2019 or so.
Indeed! The pool was growing, growing, growing until 2020. It is only in the last year and a half that it appears to have shrunk very marginally. Note that the curve in the diagram is the first derivative of working age population size, not the working age population size.
There was also a significant drop in immigration during the pandemic period which would affect working age population adversely too. I am not sure where the year by year working age population estimates were obtained from. Which of the factors affect it in what way would depend on how the estimates were arrived at. They are not actual counted numbers since we do not do census that often.Lots of things could boost the labor force even though (e.g.) higher birth rates wouldn't "pay off" for a generation. Demography isn't destiny. The U.S. is still a magnet for immigrants and intelligent policy would build on that. Better child care, both preschool and school-age, would sure help women in particular. COVID deaths (even though most have occurred among the elderly) have shrunk the labor force and so does "long COVID"...we need to come to grips with that. Even things like criminal-justice reform matter. Nice overview by economists at the Brookings Institution's Hamilton Project at Can a hot but smaller labor market keep making gains in participation?.
The growth rate went negative in 2021. That could be why finding workers has become such a significant issue just in this past year. The fact that the growth rate went negative in 2021 might not be 100% due to the pandemic, but rather it's a culmination of demographic trends that have been going on for a long time -- specifically decreasing fertility among native-born Americans and decreasing immigration since 2000. Plus, (looking at the mirror), a lot of the Baby Boomers are starting to retireIndeed! The pool was growing, growing, growing until 2020. It is only in the last year and a half that it appears to have shrunk very marginally. Note that the curve in the diagram is the first derivative of working age population size, not the working age population size.
So no. This does no explain why there is understaffing.
Enter your email address to join: