I'd expect insurance but I'm sure the lawyers are going to fight it outI suppose Ventura County will now get to cough up some large sum of money via insurance or taxpayer to compensate Amtrak for this one?
300 does look pretty bad. How was the engineer? I believe that there have been a lot of steps taken to protect the crew but that windshield looks like the locomotive had its work cut out for it to protect him.14 had an accident this morning. Poor 300 looks pretty rough. Amtrak is going to get a good trial of extensive repair work on an ALC-42.
Apparently the Charger and Sprinter Cabs are very robust safety cages. They are essentially very similar in construction. It is worth recalling that the Engineer survived in both the Cascade Talgo derailment and the Regional derailment at Frankford Jct. in addition to this one and other incidents, with relatively easily recoverable injuries.Seat belts are of no use, even hitting a truck does not really decelerate a train. The entire cab is a safety cage and despite windows shattered does not even mean glass entered cab as several layers of plastic are embedded, the corner post did their job despite being damaged.
I remember reading the transcript of the engineers radio report that his train was "on the ground". It sounded like his heart was broken. But as you say, he survived with minimal injuries.Apparently the Charger and Sprinter Cabs are very robust safety cages. They are essentially very similar in construction. It is worth recalling that the Engineer survived in both the Cascade Talgo derailment and the Regional derailment at Frankford Jct. in addition to this one and other incidents, with relatively easily recoverable injuries.
“On the ground” is simply railroad speak for derailed. Technically, the Coast Starlight last week was “on the ground” even if all the cars were basically upright and in line.I remember reading the transcript of the engineers radio report that his train was "on the ground". It sounded like his heart was broken. But as you say, he survived with minimal injuries.
Also smashing into that backhoe at 100 mph.Apparently the Charger and Sprinter Cabs are very robust safety cages. They are essentially very similar in construction. It is worth recalling that the Engineer survived in both the Cascade Talgo derailment and the Regional derailment at Frankford Jct. in addition to this one and other incidents, with relatively easily recoverable injuries.
The best way, would be the way the old Southern Railway, as well as the Norfolk & Western did..."long hood forward"...300 does look pretty bad. How was the engineer? I believe that there have been a lot of steps taken to protect the crew but that windshield looks like the locomotive had its work cut out for it to protect him.
I always wondered if there was a way to make the area under the engineers "work station" and in front of his seat into a kind of safety cage that he could duck into the second or two before the locomotive strikes something on the tracks. Seat belts may be a better bet but given the state of that windshield I am not sure an engineer would not be better off ducking rather than being secured. I guess it is a question of what is the greater threat, G-force rapid deceleration vs. flying debris/crushed cab.
Seat belts are of no use, even hitting a truck does not really decelerate a train. The entire cab is a safety cage and despite windows shattered does not even mean glass entered cab as several layers of plastic are embedded, the corner post did their job despite being damaged.
I have noticed that many do not seem to understand what a safety cage is, and that the entire cab in the new locomotives is a safety cage. That is why they talk of having a safety cage under the console and what not. They also don't appear to understand how the cars with CEM are architected with the passenger compartment as a safety cage (at least longitudinally) and stuff outside it allowed to deform to dissipate energy.We covered all that and now we are just repeating.
Yep, that would be me! LOL!I have noticed that many do not seem to understand what a safety cage is, and that the entire cab in the new locomotives is a safety cage. That is why they talk of having a safety cage under the console and what not. They also don't appear to understand how the cars with CEM are architected with the passenger compartment as a safety cage (at least longitudinally) and stuff outside it allowed to deform to dissipate energy.
Enter your email address to join: