Seaboard92
Engineer
The cheapest and most effective solution are quad gates. Or cement medians in the roadways 100 ft prior to the track. But in a lot of places that wouldn't work because roads also parallel the track in places.
The train service doesn't put anyone in danger. The idiots driving garbage trucks around crossing gates put lots of people in danger.The drone provides visibility of the track ahead for obstacles like idiots running the tracks that the engineer won’t see until too late. The horn is just an added bonus.
And today was a PR disaster for Amtrak. Who in their right mind wants to subsidize train service that puts people in danger on a regular basis? There were spouses on the train, not just Congress people.
I told someone on that train how much fun train travel was a couple of years ago. I’m not likely to do that again.
Sent from my iPhone using Amtrak Forum
Seems to me the dopes in the garbage truck didn't even "stop, look, and listen". This is not a superfast section of track; it's not a "quiet zone"; it has good visibility and audibility...Here's the deal about THIS incident from the reports I've read: Witnesses have stated that this particular grade crossing (the only one in Crozet, WV - the other crossings are not at grade) had a malfunctioning gate. It had the equipment, but it wasn't working right. It was known to fail often in the DOWN position - sometimes for hours. I know that here in Savannah, if there is a malfunctioning gate, a call to CSX immediately warns all locomotive engineers to slow down and a technician is dispatched immediately. Now, of course, in a city, there are more technicians available at the drop of a hat than in Crozet, WV, but at least the engineers would know and within an hour or two, someone would be out there figuring out why.
The problem then lies in the fact that people are Pavlov'd into thinking that EVERY time the gates are down, it's a problem, so they are conditioned to go around. Not smart - just human nature. Don't know where these guys in the garbage truck were headed, but I'm sure taking a 2 1/2 mile detour seemed pretty inconvenient at the time.
The cheapest method is to form a public-private partnership and install cameras at each crossing and fine the people who pass through while the crossing is activated. Be sure to get both the license and the windows so the fine sticks. The primary threat to the train comes from commercial vehicles so I'd put the fine for them at 50x the fine for a basic sedan.The cheapest and most effective solution are quad gates. Or cement medians in the roadways 100 ft prior to the track. But in a lot of places that wouldn't work because roads also parallel the track in places.
Victim? According to what I read it sounds like this guy was the driver. If Mr. Foley was the victim then who was the perpetrator? Isaac Newton? What a load of rubbish. Literally.On January 31st 2018, Christopher Foley was one of the victims in the Amtrak and garbage truck collision. Unfortunately, Chris lost his life. We here at the company lost a friend and a brother, his one year old son and mother of his child lost a father. We have set up this page to help Mr. Foley's family, theres no amount of money that can replace a human life. Anything that you are able to donate helps the family financially through this horrific time. We are trying to raise enough for the family to cover funeral cost and help with some living costs. All the money will go directly to Mr. Foley's family.
You seem very confident in this. As a fellow rural Virginian, I'll take the over on this happening in the next couple of decades, much less my lifetime. And I'm of the millennial generation, so I've hopefully got plenty of life ahead of me ;-)As I stated elsewhere, car and truck travel will ultimately be resolved by the requirement to use self-driving vehicles, which will obey the traffic laws. Or youll be prohibited from using the roads. It may take a couple of decades, but I expect it will happen.
That will fix most ***** problems, except for the inevitable glitches, like the crossing gates not working.
Sent from my iPhone using Amtrak Forum
The beneficiary of any charitable giving will not be the deceased that made the mistake, but his wife and 1 year old son, who I'm fairly certain are not at fault here.Victim? According to what I read it sounds like this guy was the driver. If Mr. Foley was the victim then who was the perpetrator? Isaac Newton? What a load of rubbish. Literally.On January 31st 2018, Christopher Foley was one of the victims in the Amtrak and garbage truck collision. Unfortunately, Chris lost his life. We here at the company lost a friend and a brother, his one year old son and mother of his child lost a father. We have set up this page to help Mr. Foley's family, theres no amount of money that can replace a human life. Anything that you are able to donate helps the family financially through this horrific time. We are trying to raise enough for the family to cover funeral cost and help with some living costs. All the money will go directly to Mr. Foley's family.
I have no problem with the wife, the son, or the crowdfunding of innocent survivors. I merely said calling the driver of this particular truck a victim was a load of rubbish. Looks like it was the trucking company that chose these revisionist blame-shifting words. I never thought I'd say this, but at this point I'm honestly ready for self driving trucks. They won't be perfect, and I'm sure they'll still be involved in several major accidents, but in my view the bar for commercial driving competence is already so low it's hard to imagine they could be any worse.The beneficiary of any charitable giving will not be the deceased that made the mistake, but his wife and 1 year old son, who I'm fairly certain are not at fault here.Victim? According to what I read it sounds like this guy was the driver. If Mr. Foley was the victim then who was the perpetrator? Isaac Newton? What a load of rubbish. Literally.On January 31st 2018, Christopher Foley was one of the victims in the Amtrak and garbage truck collision. Unfortunately, Chris lost his life. We here at the company lost a friend and a brother, his one year old son and mother of his child lost a father. We have set up this page to help Mr. Foley's family, theres no amount of money that can replace a human life. Anything that you are able to donate helps the family financially through this horrific time. We are trying to raise enough for the family to cover funeral cost and help with some living costs. All the money will go directly to Mr. Foley's family.
I think perhaps you're thinking of his term "victim" in a faultless sense of the word, where as likely the poster wasn't intending that. For example, someone may eat too much unhealthy food, not get enough exercise, and eventually have a heart attack. It's pretty common to still think of that person as a "heart attack victim", without intending to diminish the victim's role in the inevitable event.I have no problem with the wife, the son, or the crowdfunding of innocent survivors. I merely said calling the driver of this particular truck a victim was a load of rubbish. Looks like it was the trucking company that chose these revisionist blame-shifting words. I never thought I'd say this, but at this point I'm honestly ready for self driving trucks. They won't be perfect, and I'm sure they'll still be involved in several major accidents, but in my view the bar for commercial driving competence is already so low it's hard to imagine they could be any worse.The beneficiary of any charitable giving will not be the deceased that made the mistake, but his wife and 1 year old son, who I'm fairly certain are not at fault here.Victim? According to what I read it sounds like this guy was the driver. If Mr. Foley was the victim then who was the perpetrator? Isaac Newton? What a load of rubbish. Literally.On January 31st 2018, Christopher Foley was one of the victims in the Amtrak and garbage truck collision. Unfortunately, Chris lost his life. We here at the company lost a friend and a brother, his one year old son and mother of his child lost a father. We have set up this page to help Mr. Foley's family, theres no amount of money that can replace a human life. Anything that you are able to donate helps the family financially through this horrific time. We are trying to raise enough for the family to cover funeral cost and help with some living costs. All the money will go directly to Mr. Foley's family.
For one, this situation is a much more direct result, as eating unhealthy is a long-term thing and also does not necessarily lead to an "inevitable" heart attack. While eating unhealthy does increase the risk of a heart attack, the correlation is much less than between those who go around crossing gates and those who get hit by trains. It should also be considered that some people have eating addictions so they struggle greatly to eat healthily. However, the main reason that the analogy is misleading is that the truck driver did something illegal that endangered many other people, while eating unhealthy food is completely legal and endangers only yourself.I think perhaps you're thinking of his term "victim" in a faultless sense of the word, where as likely the poster wasn't intending that. For example, someone may eat too much unhealthy food, not get enough exercise, and eventually have a heart attack. It's pretty common to still think of that person as a "heart attack victim", without intending to diminish the victim's role in the inevitable event.I have no problem with the wife, the son, or the crowdfunding of innocent survivors. I merely said calling the driver of this particular truck a victim was a load of rubbish. Looks like it was the trucking company that chose these revisionist blame-shifting words. I never thought I'd say this, but at this point I'm honestly ready for self driving trucks. They won't be perfect, and I'm sure they'll still be involved in several major accidents, but in my view the bar for commercial driving competence is already so low it's hard to imagine they could be any worse.The beneficiary of any charitable giving will not be the deceased that made the mistake, but his wife and 1 year old son, who I'm fairly certain are not at fault here.Victim? According to what I read it sounds like this guy was the driver. If Mr. Foley was the victim then who was the perpetrator? Isaac Newton? What a load of rubbish. Literally.On January 31st 2018, Christopher Foley was one of the victims in the Amtrak and garbage truck collision. Unfortunately, Chris lost his life. We here at the company lost a friend and a brother, his one year old son and mother of his child lost a father. We have set up this page to help Mr. Foley's family, theres no amount of money that can replace a human life. Anything that you are able to donate helps the family financially through this horrific time. We are trying to raise enough for the family to cover funeral cost and help with some living costs. All the money will go directly to Mr. Foley's family.
English is required.Were not hurting yet, but plenty of work available.Commercial Truck drivers are becoming fewer and fewer, so the companies hiring these drivers have to lower their standards each year in order to put drivers in their trucks. Many companies do not require English to be spoken or read to qualify. There are are many eastern European drivers that have not learn to read and speak English do not understand our road signs. Many states want to increase the CDL licencing standards, but the trucking industry is already hurting so bad they can't without hurting the general public with reduced inventories or major price increases to cover major wage increases.
Even setting aside classic and restored cars (and old "farm" pickups so rusted out you could reach through the bodywork), there are still a fair number of 1990's model vehicles on the road today. Yet, in just a couple decades you suggest that people will be required to own self-driving vehicles which as of 2018 largely aren't even on the market yet? Seriously?As I stated elsewhere, car and truck travel will ultimately be resolved by the requirement to use self-driving vehicles, which will obey the traffic laws. Or you’ll be prohibited from using the roads. It may take a couple of decades, but I expect it will happen.
That will fix most “*****” problems, except for the inevitable glitches, like the crossing gates not working.
On a charter, the customer chooses what food service they are willing to pay for....A little of the topic but I can't help but wonder when they run a special like this for congress do they have the same food service, or do they get special treatment so as not to give them the real effects of their cutting of the diners?
Enter your email address to join: