battalion51
Engineer
Only 62011 and 62013 are stored in BG on wreck status. They derailed in the Silver Star derailment last May in Hinesville, GA.
Just Click the link above, I know there are others, but there is no source for me to check for prior ones.F59 PHI said:Quick Question.....:Have any Viewliners been in wrecks?
If so, What are their car #s.
Thanks
-- Linc
Well if you did, then you forgot to upload it. :blink: Otherwise, the fix didn't work.Viewliner said:I fixed the Page. B)
Now, its fixed, title at the top of the page and all. I forgot to rename the new page to the address of the old. B)AlanB said:Well if you did, then you forgot to upload it. :blink: Otherwise, the fix didn't work.Viewliner said:I fixed the Page. B)![]()
That would do it. :lol:Viewliner said:Now, its fixed, title at the top of the page and all. I forgot to rename the new page to the address of the old. B)AlanB said:Well if you did, then you forgot to upload it. :blink: Otherwise, the fix didn't work.Viewliner said:I fixed the Page. B)![]()
Thanks.AlanB said:That would do it. :lol:Viewliner said:Now, its fixed, title at the top of the page and all. I forgot to rename the new page to the address of the old. B)AlanB said:Well if you did, then you forgot to upload it. :blink: Otherwise, the fix didn't work.Viewliner said:I fixed the Page. B)![]()
It's fine now and looks nice!![]()
We just covered this question above in this very topic. :angry:Amtrak Railfan said:When was the last Viewliner Dinner Car out of service?
Yes, they are very nice.Amtrak Railfan said:Are the Viewliner Sleeper windows are very nice?
While they are nice, I’m not sure I agree that they are very nice. To be very nice they have to be much nicer than just nice. I don’t think they are much nicer than nice. Maybe a little nicer. But much nicer? I don’t think so. Not that there is anything wrong with nice. Nice is better than good, and good is, well, good. And lets not bash good. Afterall, good is better than OK. They definitely are better than OK, and in my opinion, they are much better than OK, which is better than just good, which is nice. But very nice? Perhaps in some opinions, but in all honesty, I think nice is the better description. By any definition, they are certainly not great. Great is even better than very nice, and if they are even not very nice, they cannot even approach being great. I’m quite comfortable with calling them nice. I am uncomfortable with very nice and would be uncomfortable with good, and OK or great would be ridiculous in the extreme. So, nice it is.Anthony said:Yes, they are very nice.Amtrak Railfan said:Are the Viewliner Sleeper windows are very nice?
:lol: :lol:PRR 60 said:While they are nice, I’m not sure I agree that they are very nice. To be very nice they have to be much nicer than just nice. I don’t think they are much nicer than nice. Maybe a little nicer. But much nicer? I don’t think so. Not that there is anything wrong with nice. Nice is better than good, and good is, well, good. And lets not bash good. Afterall, good is better than OK. They definitely are better than OK, and in my opinion, they are much better than OK, which is better than just good, which is nice. But very nice? Perhaps in some opinions, but in all honesty, I think nice is the better description. By any definition, they are certainly not great. Great is even better than very nice, and if they are even not very nice, they cannot even approach being great. I’m quite comfortable with calling them nice. I am uncomfortable with very nice and would be uncomfortable with good, and OK or great would be ridiculous in the extreme. So, nice it is.Anthony said:Yes, they are very nice.Amtrak Railfan said:Are the Viewliner Sleeper windows are very nice?
As far as I’m concerned, the Viewliner windows are nice.
I have to agree here. I have always entertained the idea of a similar design on a Superliner sleeper (a series of Superliner III's) where they had the same system, a 4 level window car might look a bit awkward, but I have a feeling it would make traveling in a standard bedroom on a Superliner equipped train nicer.Viewliner said:The Viewliner's window's are the draw to the mystique of the cars. The concept removes the claustrophobic feeling that existed/exists in the upper berth of sleepers. The windows are one of the few things done right in the design fleet.
The problem with a bi-level viewliner car is that it would be so high it would probably not clear many bridges and tunnels even outside of the Northeast.AMTRAK-P42 said:I have to agree here. I have always entertained the idea of a similar design on a Superliner sleeper (a series of Superliner III's) where they had the same system, a 4 level window car might look a bit awkward, but I have a feeling it would make traveling in a standard bedroom on a Superliner equipped train nicer.Viewliner said:The Viewliner's window's are the draw to the mystique of the cars. The concept removes the claustrophobic feeling that existed/exists in the upper berth of sleepers. The windows are one of the few things done right in the design fleet.
But undoubtedly, one of the best things about the “nice” viewliners, are the windows.
IMHO putting in windows like that would be a waste. One because in the day time when the bed is folded up the window would get covered. Two, it would not solve the problem of lack of headroom in the upper bunk, and I think I would feel even worse with a glass roof over my head. Both the Superliner and the Viewliner both have their uniuqe features, but sometimes you can't have both.battalion51 said:Well you could make the windows on the upper bunk wraparound windows (upstairs ala Superliner Lounge), downstairs just another set of small windows.