I will guess a Pug (see her avatar).Corky is a cute name. What kind of dog is he?
I will guess a Pug (see her avatar).Corky is a cute name. What kind of dog is he?
You can't tell from my avatar?Corky is a cute name. What kind of dog is he?
Seriously, ever heard of someone going somewhere else for an entire summer? Or *moving*? Or, hell, *adopting a pet* from someone else? There are plenty of reasons why people take dogs or cats along when they travel, even if you don't think people should take pets on day trips. I can think of multiple examples, actually, of "permanent move" style trips which *would have been* on the train except that there was simply no way to transport the pet. Result: rental car.I never have been able to figure out why people have to take dogs or cats along when they travel. If Amtrak does start taking on Animals they need to have Waivers so if Puss or Bowser dies en route, Amtrak is not liable.
Do you ever fly? People fly with pets in the cabin all.the.time.No! This is so cruel to animals. And cruel to people with allergies. Why do people with pets want to force them on the rest of us? How can the animal possibly be comfortable confined in a cage for up to 12 hours? Why would someone want to do that to an animal that they supposedly love?
In the kennel. And on my last flight across the pond, there was a dog onboard for the 9 hour plus flight, and I noticed the owner "wiping out" the inside of the kennel while standing in line for US Customs upon arrival.Shoot! My dog died a few days ago. It makes me more sad to think that I could have taken a train trip with him if he would have lived a little while longer. But seriously though, where is a dog supposed go poop.
While I like sorority girls and cougars, they can stow the perfume too. It gives me a raging headache.I'm allergic to perfume, to the point of serious asthma attacks, but they still let sorority girls and cougars on the train.
Or you can ask a neighbor or friend to look in on or walk your pet at your house (as my son does).I can either a) bring my dog with me, so that he is in the car for five hours (or a train for four hours) or leave him in a cage - in a kennel - for a week. I am pretty sure that he would prefer sitting in the car (or in a train) for hours versus a a kennel for a week.
Me thinks Mr. Hudson has gone overboard by using the word "cruel". Uncomfortable, MAYBE, but not even close to "cruel"..:hi: Looks like you Nailed the Perfect Perspective Dick! Caging up Animals for Long Periods is Cruel and Anyone who says Differently Doesn't Know What They're Talking About! (This from Someone who Loves Dogs but Doesn't want to have them Riding in Train Cars with Passengers!)I will not take my Archie on a train trip over two hours. It is not fair to
animals to keep them caged any longer without the ability to walk,
stretch or run not to mention bathroom facilities.
Again, "Uncomfortable" would be the harshest term I could imagine, but in no way "cruel".No! This is so cruel to animals. And cruel to people with allergies. Why do people with pets want to force them on the rest of us? How can the animal possibly be comfortable confined in a cage for up to 12 hours? Why would someone want to do that to an animal that they supposedly love?
Well, dogs are den animals. If the cage is their normal daily den, they like being in there. The dog will just sleep and wait. As long as theirs needs are regularly and periodically met (water, food, "bathroom"), they will be happy.No! This is so cruel to animals. And cruel to people with allergies. Why do people with pets want to force them on the rest of us? How can the animal possibly be comfortable confined in a cage for up to 12 hours? Why would someone want to do that to an animal that they supposedly love?
Because in the kennel the dog is locked in a cage for hours a day. So four hours a train vs. a week in a kennel - which has more cage time? The kennel.I've only visited and used the services of a few kennels. Not for me (I'm not a fan of owning another living creature), but for my mother who owns a cat. I saw them walking the dogs, letting them run and play, and interacting with them. I can't see how that was a bad thing compared to being locked in a cage for hours on a train.
Thank you Sarah.Or her dog prefers to be with her and likes traveling, so this really isn't a big deal. I trust Amamba to know what's best for Corky.
We'll just have to Agree to Disagree on this one! No Animal or Human (except for Physco Monsters like Child Molesters/Serial Killers/Rapists etc.) should be Locked up in a Cage! (I can hear Bob Dylan singing "If Dogs Run Free" in the Background!)Me thinks Mr. Hudson has gone overboard by using the word "cruel". Uncomfortable, MAYBE, but not even close to "cruel"..:hi: Looks like you Nailed the Perfect Perspective Dick! Caging up Animals for Long Periods is Cruel and Anyone who says Differently Doesn't Know What They're Talking About! (This from Someone who Loves Dogs but Doesn't want to have them Riding in Train Cars with Passengers!)I will not take my Archie on a train trip over two hours. It is not fair to
animals to keep them caged any longer without the ability to walk,
stretch or run not to mention bathroom facilities.
Enter your email address to join: