2018 2019 2020
Jan 17,783 73,568
Feb 24,098 78,707
Mar 32,899 91,903
Apr 34,615 71,308
May 56,781 85,740
Jun 48,619 80,094
Jul 52,162 83,741
Aug 54,574 74,312
Sep 52,850 61,688
Oct 60,013 83,426
Nov 80,660 100,627
Dec 98,076 127,690
2018 2019 2020
Jan $1.7m
Feb $1.9m
Mar $2.3m
Apr $1.8m
May $1.7m
Jun $0.8m $1.6m
Jul $1.0m $1.7m
Aug $0.9m $1.5m
Sep $1.0m $1.1m
Oct $1.0m $1.7m
Nov $1.5m $2.2m
Dec $2.2m $2.9m
$22.1m
Some thoughts:
-The only period we have comparable numbers has been showing about a 25-30% increase in ridership and a similar increase in overall revenue. August was higher and September lower, but IIRC full hourly service didn't begin until August 2018 and September 2019 was fouled by Dorian. For want of anything else to work with, I would presume that this continues for at least Q1-Q3 of 2020.
-A 30% increase over January 2019 would yield ridership of about 95k. A reduction from December to January in line with 2018/2019 would yield about 94k. I'm comfortable with that as a January projection.
-Likewise, I would be comfortable with a projection of 1.3m for ridership for 2020. There are, of course, significant error bars: The increase in ridership could trail off, and there's an open question as to how much demand can be accommodate in the peak hours/how time-flexible peak-hour travelers are.
--On the plus side, adding Boca Raton and Aventura in Q4 of 2020 would probably boost ridership significantly (they would, for example, increase the number of station pairs in play from 3 to 10). I don't necessarily buy the additional 2m pax/yr at this stage, but after a year or so I could see them adding a million quite easily. I'd presume that for every month that both are operational, you can add another 25-30k riders. I think that adding more becomes tricky.
--On the minus side, Tri-Rail access to Miami Central could act as a drag on ridership (as folks heading for Miami simply switch to Tri-Rail for the lower cost and higher number of station options). This comes with an asterisk, since that Tri-Rail service will also likely act as a significant booster for revenue for the operation (both via increased footfall and via access fees).
I do think that Brightline is going to slam into capacity drag on ridership somewhere south of or approaching 200k riders/month right now. As of this moment, they have 248 seats per train. In theory, that's 8,432 seats per day aside from Sundays* (248 seats*17 round trips*2 runs per round trip), and there both is and will be turnover in the seats at intermediate stations. However, relative demand is such that I don't see any way that you're filling the last train of the evening to capacity (for example), and midday demand is going to vary a bit as well. That puts about a quarter million seats available, multiplied by any expected seat turnover and whatever you think load factors can realistically be. If/when they add cars (or trains), that'll change, but until then that feels like the ceiling.
*Saturday hovers around 16 round-trips, usually with one spilling into nominal Sunday morning; Sunday sits around 12.
Brightline has not said TriRail can operate on the Miami WPB segment of FEC. Until Brightline permits TriRail to operate there TriRail won’t be operating there.
Brightline has not ordered enough equipment to offer separate short distance service. So for at least the time being there will be no separate short distance service as far as one can tell. Of course things can snd most likely will change as things evolve.
Brightline has not said TriRail can operate on the Miami WPB segment of FEC. Until Brightline permits TriRail to operate there TriRail won’t be operating there.
Brightline has not ordered enough equipment to offer separate short distance service. So for at least the time being there will be no separate short distance service as far as one can tell. Of course things can snd most likely will change as things evolve.
I don't have good data points on this front, but based on what I saw about a year ago (when I was snap-checking trains all day to figure out load distributions...before they changed the website and made that a PITA because of the new interface...) it seems probable that they've had some stray peak-hour trains selling out and quite a few coming close on at least one segment. My guess, however, is that if they're selling out it is reasonably close to departure time.Other than super bowl ridership -- look at that separately. Has any of its regular trips ended up being sold out yet ?
It’s a good time to be excited by Brightline/VT. But I will remain cautiously optimistic for years to come. We all know that this is a great corridor from a rail transit point of view. What we still don’t know and won’t for a while is if this can work in 2020. It isn’t known yet it a completely private entity can run this service successfully enough to make a profit with little if any state involvement. And not just a profit above the rails, but a profit large enough to give a return on the capital investment. The fact they are still moving toward Orlando after they have operated Miami - WPB is a good sign they at least think it’s possible and are getting enough ridership to continue on. But it still remains to be seen if this will work out - and if it ever didn’t would the state step in to keep it afloat or let it falter.
2018 2019 2020
Jan 17,783 73,568 115,109
Feb 24,098 78,707
Mar 32,899 91,903
Apr 34,615 71,308
May 56,781 85,740
Jun 48,619 80,094
Jul 52,162 83,741
Aug 54,574 74,312
Sep 52,850 61,688
Oct 60,013 83,426
Nov 80,660 100,627
Dec 98,076 127,690
2018 2019 2020
Jan $1.7m $2.4m
Feb $1.9m
Mar $2.3m
Apr $1.8m
May $1.7m
Jun $0.8m $1.6m
Jul $1.0m $1.7m
Aug $0.9m $1.5m
Sep $1.0m $1.1m
Oct $1.0m $1.7m
Nov $1.5m $2.2m
Dec $2.2m $2.9m
$22.1m
Monthly ridership and construction reports are out for January 2020.
115109 passengers carried in January up 56% over January 2019
Average fare down 10% but ticket revenue up 41% and overall revenue up 47% (compared to January 2019)
Enter your email address to join: