From Simply Railway:
I saw it, and enjoyed it. Now I actually am curious to see how Brightline West will be, as I'd actually be able to ride it. Unfortunately I doubt Amtrak will ever be able rival that type of service.
From Simply Railway:
If that reporting is accurate, looks like the opening of the Orlando extension has slipped again, from 1st qtr 2023 to "sometime in 2023".
I saw it, and enjoyed it. Now I actually am curious to see how Brightline West will be, as I'd actually be able to ride it. Unfortunately I doubt Amtrak will ever be able rival that type of service.
Concur. The original Seaboard station was out of the way, the FEC one looked impressive on an old post card, but what you saw was Miami City Hall, but at least it was downtown. Philadelphia is a much better example of what can be done when tracks run through and stations are spaced properly. FEC, with few exceptions, had pretty "blah" wooden stations. Jacksonville Terminal, a "union" station, was really spectacular.What is it with train stations in Miami and these kinds of mistakes? Just a festival of ineptitude all around.
This is the second Miami station built with taxpayer funds in less than a decade that cannot physically accommodate the trains it was supposed to accommodate. Amtrak is still stuck in Hialeah because the platform is too short at Miami Intermodal. And now this? Amtrak, TriRail and Brightline all at three different stations without any real connections. Its like a regression to the times before union stations.
I saw it, and enjoyed it. Now I actually am curious to see how Brightline West will be, as I'd actually be able to ride it. Unfortunately I doubt Amtrak will ever be able rival that type of service.
Your 3rd paragraph seems to be in conflict with your 2nd paragraph.Who knows?
If anybody else can run a better service than Amtrak, what's to stop Amtrak copying them or hiring their managers or consultants or whatever?
I think the issue here is that these are probably special cases in special situations that cannot easily be replicated. Otherwise somebody would have already done this long ago.
Next question is who the subcontractor was who actually *built* the incorrectly-built platforms, because they're gonna get sued.
It’s also a matter of funding. I mean I doubt they would pay for free rides to finish the last mile problem.Who knows?
If anybody else can run a better service than Amtrak, what's to stop Amtrak copying them or hiring their managers or consultants or whatever?
I think the issue here is that these are probably special cases in special situations that cannot easily be replicated. Otherwise somebody would have already done this long ago.
None of Birghtline's last mile rides are free rides. They are complementary rides, i.e. the cost is hidden away in the ticket price, which going forward is not going to be cheap by any means. They will charge as much as they can using yield management to the hilt. They are very good at it.It’s also a matter of funding. I mean I doubt they would pay for free rides to finish the last mile problem.
Your 3rd paragraph seems to be in conflict with your 2nd paragraph.
What is special or not easily replicated about purchasing comfortable, up-to-date, accessible coaches from the leading railcar supplier in America? It just takes money and lead time.
FECR is not directly involved in any real estate deals. All the real estate operations are under FECI, and some of them are in Brightline, which is a subsidiary of FECI.I have a worry. Once Brightline is built out and real estate deals finalized what is there to prevent of FEC holdings selling the FEC RR to NS? Then what happens to passenger service?
Amtrak's biggest obstacle to operating a world class system is... Amtrak.Who knows?
If anybody else can run a better service than Amtrak, what's to stop Amtrak copying them or hiring their managers or consultants or whatever?
I think the issue here is that these are probably special cases in special situations that cannot easily be replicated. Otherwise somebody would have already done this long ago.
Depends on the engineering. You must follow the engineering. If you aren't "fit checking" along the way, you aren't realizing there is an error in the engineering. The poor souls pouring concrete don't have a clue. Quality control typically checks what is engineered vs what is built. Liaison engineering, on the other hand, corrects engineering along the way if something can't be built per the engineering or if it conflicts with the intended function - this part which seems to be the offending factor.Next question is who the subcontractor was who actually *built* the incorrectly-built platforms, because they're gonna get sued.
Enter your email address to join: