piedpiper13
Train Attendant
- Joined
- May 5, 2003
- Messages
- 24
Definitely the Desert Wind and the Pioneer with returning the Miami - Orlando section back to the Sunset Limited B) B)
I believe the 5 biggest unserved markets are Phoenix, Las Vegas, Columbus, Nashville, and Louisville.As far as I can tell, The Floridian route has the most viable under/un-served passenger markets in the whole country. That would be even more true if the route would use the CSX trackage between Nashville and Atlanta.
This thread was started in 2003, 2 years before that route was suspended.Isn't one omission from the list the restoration of the LD Amtrak train between New Orleans and Jacksonville?
Amktrak recently had its own special train visit stations along this route that lost their Amtrak train in 2005. The special train was met by many, and featured in a recent edition of the Amtrak (in house?) magazine or newsletter.
This thread was started in 2003, 2 years before that route was suspended.Isn't one omission from the list the restoration of the LD Amtrak train between New Orleans and Jacksonville?
Amktrak recently had its own special train visit stations along this route that lost their Amtrak train in 2005. The special train was met by many, and featured in a recent edition of the Amtrak (in house?) magazine or newsletter.
Obviously a lot has changed since the original thread.Now, the top priority is obviously the Three Rivers/Broadway Limited.
The thing most likely to happen in the way of Chicago - Florida service as things stand, is the extension of the CONO to Orlando.My vote is the Floridian. It would give the benefit of added service on two corridors (I consider JAX-MIA a LD Corridor) and bring in several new markets. But it's very hard with the L&I railroad between Indy and Louisville having a very slow running speed despite recent improvements. It might actually be faster to run via CIN and take the L&N back to Louisville from there. Of course you also could go directly south on NS but miss Louisville and Nashville which would hurt the train some.
Just start another vote with the contemporary state of affairs and vote on it. Web pages and discussion threads are going really cheap these days :;Darn, you can't change your vote--I changed my mind after looking at old pictures of the Floridian--yes, that one would be lovely to have back!
Not necessarily. Now you can actually get rid of Byrd Crap.Whatever might be brought back today would be extremely easy to retire again during the next budgetfightnegotiation. If I'm going to wish for something it would be continued funding of what remains today. Still kind of iffy but at least it's based on something that's realistically achievable.
So you want us to discuss without considering cost what may be practical without causing the Amtrak budget to skyrocket? Do you see the obvious contradiction in that requirement you just stated?Let's ignore the obvious how much it costs and the argument over whether federal or state money would be used. How about the track conditions of these old lines and if any of the old stations on the lines still exist? There has been plenty said about the Floridian route but how about the National Limited or Lone Star among others? Are any of them worth pursuing that wouldn't cause the Amtrak budget to skyrocket (other than the BL/TR of course which has most if not all of the infrastructure in use right now)?