Sounds like a politician from every state in the union and every country on earth (and probably every planet in the universe that has politicians.)Sounds like an Illinois politician!Musk seems to be promising everything to everybody.
Sounds like a politician from every state in the union and every country on earth (and probably every planet in the universe that has politicians.)Sounds like an Illinois politician!Musk seems to be promising everything to everybody.
Politicians lie, cheat, and scheme because that's the sort of person who is drawn to high risk/reward propositions and because that's the sort of attitude which convinces millions of low effort casual voters to support you. Any political system worth supporting must account for and mitigate against this.Sounds like a politician from every state in the union and every country on earth (and probably every planet in the universe that has politicians.)Sounds like an Illinois politician!Musk seems to be promising everything to everybody.
You could build the tunnel with a double wall. the outer wall would be concrete and its job would basically be to support the surrounding soil. Although it would be as watertight as possible, som inflow might occur. Remember that any water ingress implies there is a water current outside the tunnel which in turn means erosion of the surrounding soil which could in the long term create cavities and destabilize the soil. So ingress should be minimized not just for nuisance reasons but to assure the long term intergrity of the tunnel.That's fine while you're digging the tunnel, but the point of a hyerloop is that the finished tube is evacuated and the train runs in a vacuum. I suppose you can seal the finished tube pretty well, but no engineered structure is perfect, so I'm not sure how this is going to be any better than a conventional subway with express stops.The technique used then was to maintain a higher air pressure in the tunneling shield. Of course that didn't totally stop ingress , just slowed it down, but they also had pumping machines to move that water out.
This, unfortunately is what I fear.A good chance that the privately-funded project goes belly-up and the public sector is left holding the bag.
Sure, but the exact point of the Hyperloop's tube is for it to be a near vacuum. So maintaining high air pressure in that tube to keep the water out probably wouldn't be the best idea in this (hypothetical) case.The technique used then was to maintain a higher air pressure in the tunneling shield. Of course that didn't totally stop ingress , just slowed it down, but they also had pumping machines to move that water out.
To be clear, what's being proposed for this O'Hare link isn't hyperloop. It's basically electric vans in a tunnel.Sure, but the exact point of the Hyperloop's tube is for it to be a near vacuum. So maintaining high air pressure in that tube to keep the water out probably wouldn't be the best idea in this (hypothetical) case.The technique used then was to maintain a higher air pressure in the tunneling shield. Of course that didn't totally stop ingress , just slowed it down, but they also had pumping machines to move that water out.
I 100% know that. That's why I said "in this (hypothetical) case."To be clear, what's being proposed for this O'Hare link isn't hyperloop. It's basically electric vans in a tunnel.Sure, but the exact point of the Hyperloop's tube is for it to be a near vacuum. So maintaining high air pressure in that tube to keep the water out probably wouldn't be the best idea in this (hypothetical) case.The technique used then was to maintain a higher air pressure in the tunneling shield. Of course that didn't totally stop ingress , just slowed it down, but they also had pumping machines to move that water out.