Got to file first, so you make more money.
There are a number of errors in their filing, probably caused by the rush. Note that one of the firms is in Philadelphia. They probably cut and pasted from the lawsuits in the NEC crash.
Possibly the biggest error is stating that the train was on the BNSF all the way from Chicago as a justification for suing the BNSF in Illinois. Another serious error is their claim that PTC failed to prevent the accident, as there is no sign that this had anything to do with PTC. Instead, that's a clue that this is a cut and paste from the NEC overspeed accident.
I noted that in the gentleman's interview. To have crawled through a broken window of the SSL between the car and the ground in order to escape, could I/would I have done so? Was this the best decision one could make at that time? Would it have been better to wait for the emergency responders (or Amtrak crew) to give me directions as to what to do?
Obviously, the decisions he made were to his benefit.
To clarify the Empire Builder train 7 leaving Chicago to Minneapolis St.Paul is on Canadian Pacific tracks (formerly the Milwaukee Road)There are a number of errors in their filing, probably caused by the rush. Note that one of the firms is in Philadelphia. They probably cut and pasted from the lawsuits in the NEC crash.
Possibly the biggest error is stating that the train was on the BNSF all the way from Chicago as a justification for suing the BNSF in Illinois. Another serious error is their claim that PTC failed to prevent the accident, as there is no sign that this had anything to do with PTC. Instead, that's a clue that this is a cut and paste from the NEC overspeed accident.
It’s a glitch on the tracker. Someone on FB said it’s showing km even though it says mph#7 looks to be moving along just fine! I don’t know why the speed is showing so high but many I looked at are like that this morning Are there areas where the track limit is higher that the 79 mph I keep hearing about? Either way Empire Builder is back in action I can’t wait to board her Thursday afternoon (tomorrow)!
That's gotta be some kind of weird artifact and not the actual speed.Are there areas where the track limit is higher that the 79 mph I keep hearing about?
I just answered my own question. Yes, they have sued Amtrak before.Could it be that the Philadelphia law firm has prior experience in suing Amtrak?
I believe that photo was taken after they intentionally flipped the cars over. Other photos show the roofs in good condition after the initial tip.You can see how badly the roofs are buckled and dented. As well as the debris scattered around from when they rolled and the stuff came out of the windows and end door.
View attachment 24619
Civil Rule of Procedure 11 prevents them from just guessing - or at least can sanction them if they are just guessing. The rule says that they must have a factual basis for their allegations. I also doubt that they would stake their professional reputation on a mere guess. My hunch is that whoever they use as an expert witness has some connections.s others have pointed out it was obviously written quickly and poorly but the amount of mention of these issues makes me wonder if they know something we don't. They may also just be guessing like we all are here...
I find it amusing that their press release characterizes themselves as "leading railroad catastrophe lawyers". Leading, as in, closest to the ambulances?I just answered my own question. Yes, they have sued Amtrak before.
https://www.smbb.com/news-article/amtrak-hit-with-more-lawsuits-from-philadelphia-derailment/
And after this most recent accident they put out a press release looking for victims:
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-rel...l-amtrak-derailment-in-montana-301385158.html
Apparently the press release worked.
Not sure who wrote the lawsuit document posted here earlier, but it’s full of errors and awful takes. How can you even sue prior to the investigation and ANY report being released? The lawsuit just generically blames Amtrak and BNSF for everything.
I find it amusing that their press release characterizes themselves as "leading railroad catastrophe lawyers". Leading, as in, closest to the ambulances?
Really doesn't seem like something to be proud of.
These guys have been extremely successful in the past. I would not be so quick to brush them off.I read it and it took me a while to stop laughing. If these guys succeed I will lose whatever shred of faith I have in the various court systems in the US.
Unfortunately, I lost that a long time ago. The sad reality is the amount of money Amtrak/BNSF is looking at to just make this go away vs the total cost of a full trial even if they are found not guilty.I read it and it took me a while to stop laughing. If these guys succeed I will lose whatever shred of faith I have in the various court systems in the US.
Enter your email address to join: