Nothing can be done to ELIMINATE the chance other than to stop running trains.This trains hitting trespassers is just getting worse and worse. Every day! The question is, why is it getting worse, and what can we do to eliminate the chance of trains hitting trespassers?
Check this out and then let me know if it is indeed getting worse and worse (no, I did not read it myself).This trains hitting trespassers is just getting worse and worse. Every day! The question is, why is it getting worse, and what can we do to eliminate the chance of trains hitting trespassers?
This has been happening since the first train ran on the first track. People take stupid chances. Today is no worse than the past.This trains hitting trespassers is just getting worse and worse. Every day! The question is, why is it getting worse, and what can we do to eliminate the chance of trains hitting trespassers?
And I don't understand why that should be necessary. It isn't like the trains go off the tracks and chase people down. If you aren't on the tracks, you aren't going to get hit. Period.I dont understand why in built up areas the train companies arent legally required to fence off the rails, I get due to the vastness of the states it would be impossible to fence them off completely but in towns and cities it would be possible, we manage it in Europe and have far more miles of tracks in cities.
IMHO, its that the news of such, travels faster and further than in past years. For example, someone hit by a train might make the next day's local paper, but today, within seconds, its posted here.This has been happening since the first train ran on the first track. People take stupid chances. Today is no worse than the past.This trains hitting trespassers is just getting worse and worse. Every day! The question is, why is it getting worse, and what can we do to eliminate the chance of trains hitting trespassers?
Did you read the post above yours?Back in the dark ages, 1980's, we didn't hear about pedestrian strikes that happened in another state and if we lived in a large state we probably didn't hear about all the ones in our own state.How in the heck is it even decreasing? I hear about trains hitting people at least once a week.
If you follow the link that was provided above to the FRA Office of Safety Analysis statistics and enter a query for Amtrak only, trespasser fatalities from January to December 2015, Amtrak was involved in 81 such fatalities in 2015. So even limiting to just fatal incidents, it happens more than just once a week on average.How in the heck is it even decreasing? I hear about trains hitting people at least once a week.
A lot of them are and it doesn't stop people. Not far from my place, there's even barbed wire on top to keep people from trying. That just means you get to see an old blanket over the barbed wire every once in a while.I dont understand why in built up areas the train companies arent legally required to fence off the rails, I get due to the vastness of the states it would be impossible to fence them off completely but in towns and cities it would be possible, we manage it in Europe and have far more miles of tracks in cities.
At 909 trespassers hit and killed in 2015 according to those Operation Lifesaver numbers that's an average 2.5 people per day.How in the heck is it even decreasing? I hear about trains hitting people at least once a week.
According to Post #15 data, Amtrak was involved in 81 or 9% of those 909 fatalities in 2015 for an average of 0.22 people per day or 1 fatality every 4½ days.At 909 trespassers hit and killed in 2015 according to those Operation Lifesaver numbers that's an average 2.5 people per day.
Sad! And this the best place to live in most people's opinions!Overall, suicides have increased in the US in recent years. From a CDC study:
Here's a link to the CDC page I've quoted: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db241.htm
- From 1999 through 2014, the age-adjusted suicide rate in the United States increased 24%, from 10.5 to 13.0 per 100,000 population, with the pace of increase greater after 2006.
The answer is obvious....and typical.Did you read the post above yours?How in the heck is it even decreasing? I hear about trains hitting people at least once a week.
i don't understand why that should be a requirement. We do not legal require a fence around the ocean to keep people from drowning(although around these parts, you do have to fence in your backyard if you have a pool,). Nor do we legally require every road to have a fence around it except at designated crossings. Why should you single out a train, which is on a dedicated right of way.I dont understand why in built up areas the train companies arent legally required to fence off the rails, I get due to the vastness of the states it would be impossible to fence them off completely but in towns and cities it would be possible, we manage it in Europe and have far more miles of tracks in cities.
This is another time I wish there was a "like" feature on AU (hint hint). I wouldn't be able to like everything another this post enough.The answer is obvious....and typical.Did you read the post above yours?How in the heck is it even decreasing? I hear about trains hitting people at least once a week.
i don't understand why that should be a requirement. We do not legal require a fence around the ocean to keep people from drowning(although around these parts, you do have to fence in your backyard if you have a pool,). Nor do we legally require every road to have a fence around it except at designated crossings. Why should you single out a train, which is on a dedicated right of way.I dont understand why in built up areas the train companies arent legally required to fence off the rails, I get due to the vastness of the states it would be impossible to fence them off completely but in towns and cities it would be possible, we manage it in Europe and have far more miles of tracks in cities.
Enter your email address to join: