FRA planning for the NEC Future

Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum

Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Status
Not open for further replies.

CHamilton

Engineer
AU Supporting Member
Gathering Team Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2011
Messages
5,307
Location
Seattle
I thought there was a thread on the NEC Future process, but I'm not seeing it.

Rail planners outline various remedies for Northeast Corridor



Federal planners on Wednesday outlined possible futures for passenger rail service on the Northeast Corridor, ranging from minimal service improvements to an entirely new high-speed rail corridor between Boston and Washington.


The presentation in Center City by Federal Railroad Administration officials was one of nine this month in cities along the 457-mile corridor to explain how the FRA is developing a final "NEC Future" proposal.

The four broad alternatives outlined Wednesday are the latest steps in planning for upgrading the corridor over the next 25 years.

via Acela150
 
We the informed here should not have to depend exclusively on second and third hand hearsay information from news articles on the specific NEC Futures project when we know the source of the information :)

NEC Futures: A Rail Investment Plan for the Northeast Corridor

Look for all Reports under Project Documents in the list in the left margin list.

And a very nice set of FAQs at Answers to your FAQs.

Also hidden away somewhere within the bowels of AU are meeting reports and such from me from the previous round of meetings which I attended.

Here are a few relevant earlier threads:

I'll will expand this list as I find more relevant threads.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Appears this was overlooked, but the NEC Future study website posted a No Action Alternative Report dated April, 2015. (Direct link to 17.4 MB PDF document, 74 pages). What exactly is the report about? Excerpt from the document:

Under NEPA, the No Action Alternative is sometimes referred to as the No Build condition. For the Tier 1 EIS, the FRA has defined the No Action Alternative as the condition of the Northeast region’s multi-modal transportation system in 2040. The FRA will use the No Action Alternative as a baseline against which the FRA will compare the effects of each of the Action Alternatives.

For this Tier 1 EIS, the No Action Alternative is not a “do nothing” alternative. Instead, it assumes that sufficient capital investment is available to keep the NEC’s systems and infrastructure functioning properly to support existing services levels. However, if continued capital investments are not implemented the NEC’s reliability, capacity, and services levels would decline. Forecasting the implications of insufficient funding on the performance of the eight commuter railroads and Amtrak would be difficult and would be somewhat subjective. This is due to the uncertainty of what improvements might or might not be funded and what their performance implications might be. Therefore, the FRA decided to evaluate a No Action Alternative separate from the discussion of historic or future funding trends and to qualitatively discuss the implications of insufficient funding (see Section 3.2, Disinvestment Scenario).
I have only skimmed the document so far, but it does have a useful summary of all the funded NEC and NEC connecting corridor projects (by Amtrak and the state agencies), the funded or unfunded mandates, and the unfunded projects that have to be done or else no NEC. The document also lists approved transit system projects along the NEC and even aviation & highway projects (along or near the NEC and connecting corridors).
 
The Tier I EIS Alternatives Report along with an Appendix A on Service Plans and Equipment Options has been released and posted to the NEC Future Reports page. This is a critical guidance document for any future projects to upgrade or expand the NEC. I have not had the time to do more than glance through the main report, but there are a lot of options and possible levels of improvements to discuss.
 
The Tier 1 EIS is an important step but as someone familiar with how these environmental planning documents work, take the proposed equipment and service scenarios with a grain of salt. There for analytical purposes only and transportation forecasting is much more of an art than a science! It only has a slight real basis in reality.
 
The technical memorandum is an interesting read. Of particular interest is stuff down around page 77, which implies several trains being added WAS-RVR on top of SEHSR and Hampton Roads plans (as well as adding two trains out to at least Charlottesville on top of existing/planned service). Interestingly enough, though it could be worked around without seriously impacting plans, there's no second Pennsylvanian in the mix.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The FRA has released the Tier 1 Final EIS for the NEC with a recommended preferred Alternative. A lot of material to digest and discuss. The recommendations include several new route segments of the NEC, most notably the Shore Line Bypass in eastern CT which has already encountered a lot of resistance from the communities along the route. Also, the idea for a new tunnel and station under downtown Philly ($$$$) is dropped in favor of running the HSR trains through 30th Street station, which I don't consider a surprise. But still retains the plan for adding new tracks to directly access the Philadelphia airport which I regard as of questionable value given the cost given that the airport has direct SEPTA service.

FRA Press release with links: Upgrades to allow for more frequent, reliable and faster rail service along the Northeast Corridor recommended.

Link to the NEC Future page with all the Tier 1 EIS chapters and appendices: Tier 1 Final EIS.

Excerpt from the press release:

The recommendation announced today by the FRA would increase reliability and provide more options by:

  • Adding new tracks to increase the Northeast Corridor to four tracks in most locations, which would allow for more frequent and faster service. Additional tracks would be added to areas with greater demand.
  • Providing intercity access to Philadelphia Airport so that passengers do not have to change trains at 30th Street.
  • Adding direct and frequent service to Hartford, Conn., and Springfield, Mass.
  • Increasing, and in some cases doubling, the number of regional trains and providing up to five times more intercity trains.
The recommendation would improve travel times:

  • Travel from Boston to New York City would be 45 minutes faster (total time of 2 hours, 45 minutes).
  • Travel from New York City to Washington, D.C., would be 35 minutes faster (total time of 2 hours, 10 minutes).
While the recommendation made today would grow the role of rail along the Northeast Corridor, it prioritizes bringing the current corridor back to good condition, or a state of good repair, first.
Some "light" weekend reading for those interested.
 
Also, the idea for a new tunnel and station under downtown Philly ($$$$) is dropped in favor of running the HSR trains through 30th Street station, which I don't consider a surprise. But still retains the plan for adding new tracks to directly access the Philadelphia airport which I regard as of questionable value given the cost given that the airport has direct SEPTA service.
Mostly agree about the PHL reroute, though it's questionable to call it "direct" for those approaching from the south. I'm guessing it was kept in there as a nod to the PA congressional delegation, as it's a highly visible modification in a way that straightening out a curve or two isn't.
 
Lots of bedtime reading. The detailed maps show a lot of curve easing including Elizabeth and the 188 crash site. 4 tracks almost everywhere. If those times are ever achieved then the capacity with the same equipment goes up dramatically. The intermediate time but even WASH <> NYP <> BOS will definitely cut into road traffic ? Much will depend on the commuter rails being coordinated with the Amtrak schedules.

http://www.necfuture.com/tier1_eis/feis/
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top