ashleyryan15
Train Attendant
Luckily it would've had to be absurdly late or early for that to be a riskAll of us should thank the powers that be that neither Capitol Limited was next to this freight when it derailed.
Luckily it would've had to be absurdly late or early for that to be a riskAll of us should thank the powers that be that neither Capitol Limited was next to this freight when it derailed.
Seems to me, they could run the Cap over a CSX routing between Cleveland and Pittsburgh maybe…Why can't they run the CL over either the Cardinal or the LSL route, to handle passengers between CHI & WAS? Even if they just added the CL equipment to the LSL to provide the capacity for displaced CL passengers; the westernmost parts of the routes overlap, and passengers bound for WAS or PGH could get there from NYP (though it might take an extra day.)
LSL route won't work because of tunnels and related NEC clearance issues for Superliners. Cardinal route is a possibility if CSX can find pilots and still it would take so much longer that they would run out of equipment and lead to random cancellations anyway. I suspect they could run alternate days at best.
If they could get CSX's permission they could run the Cap upto Albany I suppose, and then run a connecting special Empire Service to New York, if they can find the equipment.
It would make more sense to turn the Cap at Cleveland (which is difficult due to lack of infrastructure), and Pittsburgh and bus bridge in between, if there was the stomach to do so. But as we know given the situation with host railroad cooperation etc. the tendency is to punt.
Smart Plan!Oy. I have a 2/18 trip out of Chicago on the Cap. I have rebooked on the Cardinal. I guess I can take the Bus or an Uber home from Trenton.
While it is true that the longer the train, the more likely it is that a malfunction in say a car's braking system might cause an incident, it might be premature to assume something in the train is responsible. Once the immediate hazard is under control the NTSB will have to get in there and determine the cause. Could be broken rail, any number of things.I think it's time to put pressure to stop freight from being 140 cars long, especially when they are carrying flammables and toxins.
Officials conduct a controlled release of a highly-flammable chemical on the train in the hopes of avoiding a massive explosion.
While it's not confirmed, there was at least one social media video of a small fire under one of the cars prior to the derailment (hot box?), and the NTSB people did say in their last news conference that there were preliminary indications of a possible mechanical failure. I don't recall the exact wording, but it was very waffley.While it is true that the longer the train, the more likely it is that a malfunction in say a car's braking system might cause an incident, it might be premature to assume something in the train is responsible. Once the immediate hazard is under control the NTSB will have to get in there and determine the cause. Could be broken rail, any number of things.
Something to do with an axleWhile it's not confirmed, there was at least one social media video of a small fire under one of the cars prior to the derailment (hot box?), and the NTSB people did say in their last news conference that there were preliminary indications of a possible mechanical failure. I don't recall the exact wording, but it was very waffley.
"Hot Box" would be something to do with an axle since it refers to what amount to a broken bearing, which causes the axle to overheat and then the bearing mount to disintegrate unless the train stops before that comes to pass, causing a derailment.Something to do with an axle
I had thought that they had trackside detectors that measured temperature in addition to dragging equipment?"Hot Box" would be something to do with an axle since it refers to what amount to a broken bearing, which causes the axle to overheat and then the bearing mount to disintegrate unless the train stops before that comes to pass, causing a derailment.
This is relatively unusual in properly inspected roller bearings these days, but was much more common in pre-roller bearing times with the friction bearings that were lubricated using grease and cotton waste, which tended to catch fire if something went wrong. I remember back in the days trains were carefully inspected for such at each major stop back in India. Each axle was checked. Nothing of the sort is done with roller bearings. They are checked once a day typically.
IIRC, the NTSB also said there was a positive indication from a defect detector shortly before the incident. And they said an emergency brake application was "initiated". They're very careful about not revealing details before the investigation, so there was no timeline given, and it wasn't said whether the brake application was "initiated" by the crew or by some other means. At the the time, they had retrieved the cab data and video recorders, but it sounded like they hadn't been analyzed yet.I had thought that they had trackside detectors that measured temperature in addition to dragging equipment?
Enter your email address to join: