Long Distance (LD) fleet replacement RFP discussion 2024 H1

shop deals on amazon
Shop deals on ebay
Advertise with us
Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum

Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
jiml said:
Not at all, but there is a tendency to rule them out due to their recent issues with Amtrak and SNCF orders. Through their Bombardier subsidiary they continue to be a leader in bi-level commuter cars and hold the patents/blueprints for the Superliner fleet. This could give them an advantage. It is entirely possible they could botch this up too, but the FOI post showed they had been invited to participate. Siemens is likely to run into the capacity concerns mentioned previously and might not commit to building a new domestic bi-level facility for what will be a very small and possibly one-time order.

If Hitachi was going to break into the NA long distance market the logical place would have been the Airo order - a style of train they deliver around the rest of the world. Do they even build bi-levels in any quantity?
Click to expand...
It seems to me that many of the problems with the Avelia sets, at least according to Alstom, is the sometimes-questionable Northeast Corridor track and the Avelia design. I doubt if standard bi-levels would have problems with track.
 
Harmon Shay said:
It seems to me that many of the problems with the Avelia sets, at least according to Alstom, is the sometimes-questionable Northeast Corridor track and the Avelia design. I doubt if standard bi-levels would have problems with track.
Click to expand...
If the SNCF Avelia launch wasn't having similar issues to Amtrak's rollout I'd be a lot more confident it was Bombardier merger trouble. My understanding is also that Alstom had trouble building a computer model of the NEC, which may have been made more difficult due to the complexity of the infrastructure there but doesn't speak well of their design practices either. Especially given the myriad of parties that seemed to think they could assist.
 
I wouldn't be surprised about Bombardier merger trouble. I remember reading that Bombardier had gone the way of so many other big companies, making bad management choices and winding up with production problems and overpaid executives. I know one of our Sounder coach orders out here was delayed quite a bit, though some of that may have had to do with the pandemic. Now, with only five-coach trains instead of seven on the south line most of the time and only two of the original four trainsets running on the north line, Sounder has something like 25 coaches in storage. And by my equipment rotation figuring, restructuring from a weekday commute-only service (with some game trains on weekends) to all-day seven-day-a-week service could put even more coaches in storage, at least temporarily. That's based on a proposed schedule that's floating around.
 
Harmon Shay said:
I know one of our Sounder coach orders out here was delayed quite a bit, though some of that may have had to do with the pandemic. Now, with only five-coach trains instead of seven on the south line most of the time and only two of the original four trainsets running on the north line, Sounder has something like 25 coaches in storage. And by my equipment rotation figuring, restructuring from a weekday commute-only service (with some game trains on weekends) to all-day seven-day-a-week service could put even more coaches in storage, at least temporarily. That's based on a proposed schedule that's floating around.
Click to expand...
This is also due to two things: new passenger information systems are being installed in the new cars first. These need to be completed and tested before the rollout. Once they're good to go, the new cars will finally be rotated in and more older cars will start to go through that process.

Second, Amtrak was having staffing issues surrounding maintenance and adding additional trips to Cascades. As a compromise, Sound Transit shortened most trains to five cars so Amtrak had less to maintain overall since the ridership numbers were down. I do think we're getting close to wanting additional coaches again (or at least look more into additional trips throughout the day which may alleviate some of that anyway.)

Back to the Amtrak future LD fleet: I'm also really curious what Stadler does and we could still see a dark horse bid from one of the others listed. I still think Siemens is the one to beat, Alstom has its issues, but I'd like to see how their rhythm increases with the Metra and CTDOT orders progress, so I still wouldn't count them out (with their California car blueprints after-all). I just want to know more, but only time will tell.
 
For a lack of other recent information:

I was invited on a tour of the Stadler Factory in Salt Lake City this last week. During the presentation before the tour we were shown a phased expansion plan for the site that involves adding a second assembly hall, a large carshell welding facility, and more finishing halls. The largest phase has been funded and should begin construction soon. The first phase would more than double the factory footprint while it will triple by the end of the project.

What stood out to me was a mention that there will be some capacity for stainless steel at this factory in the future to accommodate a stainless steel light-rail platform that they are currently bidding on at least two contracts in the US. It is guaranteed that any LD stock (Amtrak or VIA) will be stainless steel. Based on a vague answer from an employee on the subject, it is safe to assume that Stadler is also vying for VIA's LD order.

I also got to see Stadler's bid on the Amtrak intercity contract that Siemens ended up winning, they certainly had an interesting concept.

It'll probably be at least several more months before a preferred vendor is chosen. Though Stadler is a pretty long shot for LD stock, I am still anxiously awaiting news on the subject.

Here's the one picture I was allowed to take inside the factory:

PXL_20240628_170721422_110749.jpg
 
Paniolo Man said:
For a lack of other recent information:

I was invited on a tour of the Stadler Factory in Salt Lake City this last week. During the presentation before the tour we were shown a phased expansion plan for the site that involves adding a second assembly hall, a large carshell welding facility, and more finishing halls. The largest phase has been funded and should begin construction soon. The first phase would more than double the factory footprint while it will triple by the end of the project.

What stood out to me was a mention that there will be some capacity for stainless steel at this factory in the future to accommodate a stainless steel light-rail platform that they are currently bidding on at least two contracts in the US. It is guaranteed that any LD stock (Amtrak or VIA) will be stainless steel. Based on a vague answer from an employee on the subject, it is safe to assume that Stadler is also vying for VIA's LD order.

I also got to see Stadler's bid on the Amtrak intercity contract that Siemens ended up winning, they certainly had an interesting concept.

It'll probably be at least several more months before a preferred vendor is chosen. Though Stadler is a pretty long shot for LD stock, I am still anxiously awaiting news on the subject.

Here's the one picture I was allowed to take inside the factory:

View attachment 37059
Click to expand...

Lol what was Stadler's bid for the Amtrak coaches? And which two contracts are they currently bidding on?

Furthermore, as far as I know, Stadler only makes aluminum trains--which makes me believe that Amtrak is likely to go with Siemens, Alstom or Kawasaki for the new long-distance cars.

Although I have never ridden a Stadler train before, I do believe that their rolling stock--such as the KISS--look awesome.
 
I'm also interested in the Stadler intercity (Northeast Corridor?) fleet plan - I assume you can't give details, but was it a novel design or was it closely derived from an existing Stadler product family?
 
thefirewarde said:
I'm also interested in the Stadler intercity (Northeast Corridor?) fleet plan - I assume you can't give details, but was it a novel design or was it closely derived from an existing Stadler product family?
Click to expand...
What is the Stadler Intercity (Northeast Corridor?) fleet plan. The Northeast Corridor non-Acela fleet is being supplied by Siemens in the form of the Airo trainsets.
 
jis said:
What is the Stadler Intercity (Northeast Corridor?) fleet plan. The Northeast Corridor non-Acela fleet is being supplied by Siemens in the form of the Airo trainsets.
Click to expand...
I wasn't allowed to take pictures, but it appeared to be a long-distance FLIRT derivative. It seemed similar to what they have sold in Norway. Of course we won't be seeing it here any time soon as that contract was awarded to Siemens with their Airo platform. There is a possibility that I am misremembering things, but It seemed to just be a very ling FLIRT DMU Dual Mode.

Johnny said:
Lol what was Stadler's bid for the Amtrak coaches? And which two contracts are they currently bidding on?

Furthermore, as far as I know, Stadler only makes aluminum trains--which makes me believe that Amtrak is likely to go with Siemens, Alstom or Kawasaki for the new long-distance cars.

Although I have never ridden a Stadler train before, I do believe that their rolling stock--such as the KISS--look awesome.
Click to expand...

An employee specifically mentioned that they are bidding on two light rail contracts, I know with 100% confidence that they are bidding on UTA's SD Unit replacement. I have no idea what the second may be. I am decently confident that Stadler is bidding metro vehicles for SEPTA and potentially another customer. When I mentioned VIA the sales guy smiled and nodded, perhaps I shouldn't read into it too much, but VIA seems a better fit for Stadler than Amtrak.

What is relevant to the LD order in all of this, is the fact that the Light Rail platform they intend to introduce seems to be of a more conventional steel design. I may be wrong about this, but I recall it being mentioned. They intend to have capacity for steel cars in the US. They have made Steel cars in Europe before, including the bilevels for Rocky Mountaineer that were shipped to Canada from Switzerland. I definitely believe that Alstom has a better chance, however Stadler certainly has the ability to build what Amtrak wants.
 
Stadler likes boldly bidding outside the bounds of what is asked if they think their way is better. They won Caltrain because they were the only bidder willing to accommodate 2 door heights. They bid aluminum EMU metro sets when MARTA asked for steel cars. They tried the same with LA metro, who were less receptive to the idea.

I hope they don't play these games with Amtrak because Amtrak is far less likely to tolerate bids that are out of spec.
 
Johnny said:
Lol what was Stadler's bid for the Amtrak coaches? And which two contracts are they currently bidding on?

Furthermore, as far as I know, Stadler only makes aluminum trains--which makes me believe that Amtrak is likely to go with Siemens, Alstom or Kawasaki for the new long-distance cars.

Although I have never ridden a Stadler train before, I do believe that their rolling stock--such as the KISS--look awesome.
Click to expand...
LA Metro currently uses stainless steel lrv's in their fleet. They are also in the early stages of purchasing new vehicles. They just recently hired a company to manage the procurement of the new vehicles they are calling the P3030
https://boardagendas.metro.net/board-report/2020-0056/
 
Not that it means anything, but the Avelia Liberties that are hopefully due to go into service later this year were constructed of aluminum. So we'll have to wait and see what happens with the order.
 
So what are the advantages and disadvantages of Aluminum vs. Stainless Steel? Stainless Steel cars seem to last forever and aluminum cars seem to age more quickly but that's from anecdotal observation. Aluminum cars should be lighter in weight I would guess. If aluminum cars wear out quicker but cost much less then that might justify their use. Any thoughts?
 
cocojacoby said:
So what are the advantages and disadvantages of Aluminum vs. Stainless Steel? Stainless Steel cars seem to last forever and aluminum cars seem to age more quickly but that's from anecdotal observation. Aluminum cars should be lighter in weight I would guess. If aluminum cars wear out quicker but cost much less then that might justify their use. Any thoughts?
Click to expand...
Our Edmonton Transit CCF Brill trolley coaches were aluminum and were in service on heavy lines for 24 to 30 years, about twice as long as typical transit buses.
 
Paniolo Man said:
Aluminum may work well for light transit vehicles and MUs, but I doubt Amtrak will take aluminum for any LD sets.
Click to expand...
Aren't the AGV based cars of the Avelia Liberty made of Aluminum Alloy, also same as for TGV Duplex? Maybe Amtrak might change its mind on that matter?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top