St. Paul, Milwaukee, Chicago (TCMC) second daily service

Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum

Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Status
Not open for further replies.
SPUD facility needs to be improved to the point that no use is made of the old Midway station to be a fully functioning terminal. That means do what is necesseary to cut/add coaches and PV's on the Empire Builder, station a yard switcher there, whether Minnestoa Commercial or Amtrak (I don't care which), handle at least another corridor train whether it be from Duluth or Madison, as well as coach cleaners, toilet dumps, commissary to restock, and car watering. That should have been done in the initial design, not simply a vanity way station it now is.
 
You’re link appears to be broken, do you have another by chance?
Not to preempt Silophant from responding, but I did find the link since I noticed this one was broken. Here's a general link to their March 19th meeting (see agena, packet, video, etc.) and here is a direct link to the video.

Having read through all the materials + watched the video, it is more clear that the commissioners really wanted to preserve access to SPUD for all types of special train movements and events, from Train Day, to I think the 261 (?), to pretty much anything that is not Amtrak. Commissioners + the materials also made clear that they viewed their original agreement with Amtrak from about a decade ago to be unfavorable, and they used this opportunity to re-negotiate it. Honestly, I had forgotten--silly me--that the County actually owned all of the tracks in addition to the depot. Makes more sense why they were able to + wanted to have more control and leverage.
 
I am curious as to what kind of cars are going to be used on that 2nd train ( TCMC) ---
Since the trips both directions will be for the most part in daylight hours sleepers would not be a prime concern ---
But then maybe a viewliner or 2 ?
Hoping to see a consist/configuration of coaches cafe and a business car a baggage car ?
As for motive power of course one locomotive maybe two in a push---pull ?

Heck I am good at predictions - throwing darts blindfolded at a revolving pinata dart board ! LOL !
 
I am curious as to what kind of cars are going to be used on that 2nd train ( TCMC) ---
Since the trips both directions will be for the most part in daylight hours sleepers would not be a prime concern ---
But then maybe a viewliner or 2 ?
Hoping to see a consist/configuration of coaches cafe and a business car a baggage car ?
As for motive power of course one locomotive maybe two in a push---pull ?

Heck I am good at predictions - throwing darts blindfolded at a revolving pinata dart board ! LOL !
I would guess initially it would be whatever they can pull together, coaches and a cafe most likely. The EB takes 8:26 (according to the schedule) to get to MSP, leaving at 3:05 PM, so it is really too short a route for an overnight sleeper. Most likely, west bound, it would leave CUS 8 or 9 AM and arrive in MSP at about 4:30 or 5:30 PM, so definitely no sleeper, but it absolutely needs to serve lunch.

When the new Airo trainsets arrive, they would probably use one (or two) of them.
 
Various sources (see earlier in this thread for more details) have said that the TCMC will be using, to start with, Horizon cars. Others have said that, since the Hiawatha (sometimes/traditionally?) has some sort of a cafe/lounge car, and the TCMC will be an extension of a Hiawatha trip, that it will or at least *should* have a cafe car of some type--especially given the much longer trip. However, others have said that there aren't many available Horizon cafe/food service cars, so we'll see. For example, 3 of the food service Horizon cars have been leased to Caltrans since 2013, though some on the Empire Builder Facebook page have claimed Amtrak's recently asked for them "back." (could be hearsay ;))

Given how much longer the trip on the TCMC will be compared to the Hiawatha & associated longer-distance travelers with more luggage, I agree that there should be a baggage car of some type. In addition to just the distance, it is likely that many college students, who often bring lots of luggage to/from home and school, will use the TCMC. I know the Hiawatha has traditionally had baggage space, including for bikes, though the venerable 'cabbage' (cab car-baggage) cars, but those are being retired slowly (?) and regardless won't be used for the TCMC.
 
I am curious as to what kind of cars are going to be used on that 2nd train ( TCMC) ---
Since the trips both directions will be for the most part in daylight hours sleepers would not be a prime concern ---
But then maybe a viewliner or 2 ?
Hoping to see a consist/configuration of coaches cafe and a business car a baggage car ?
As for motive power of course one locomotive maybe two in a push---pull ?

Heck I am good at predictions - throwing darts blindfolded at a revolving pinata dart board ! LOL !
Probably coaches, cafe and baggage. Similar to the Pennsylvanian which is a day train of similar duration. Perhaps one of those cafes with half business class seating if they decide to offer BC
 
I am curious as to what kind of cars are going to be used on that 2nd train ( TCMC) ---
Since the trips both directions will be for the most part in daylight hours sleepers would not be a prime concern ---
But then maybe a viewliner or 2 ?
Hoping to see a consist/configuration of coaches cafe and a business car a baggage car ?
As for motive power of course one locomotive maybe two in a push---pull ?

Heck I am good at predictions - throwing darts blindfolded at a revolving pinata dart board ! LOL !
Refurbished Horizon equipment, cafe/business car, and push pull.
 
I would guess initially it would be whatever they can pull together, coaches and a cafe most likely. The EB takes 8:26 (according to the schedule) to get to MSP, leaving at 3:05 PM, so it is really too short a route for an overnight sleeper. Most likely, west bound, it would leave CUS 8 or 9 AM and arrive in MSP at about 4:30 or 5:30 PM, so definitely no sleeper, but it absolutely needs to serve lunch.

When the new Airo trainsets arrive, they would probably use one (or two) of them.
Currently there is no plan to use Airos in the Midwest state service. They will use whatever equipment the states involved come up with. For now at least it will essentially be Hiawatha sets. The way the train is scheduled it will need two sets to operate. Of course the states involved could choose to have Amtrak acquire a few Airos for them. But nothing of the sort has happened yet.
 
Official announcement from the GRRC about the operating and lease agreements for SPUD between Ramsey County & Amtrak being approved earlier this week: https://www.greatriverrail.org/post/amendments-approved-second-train-launch-date-closer

For those keeping track, per the GRRC's email this morning that functioned as their "2023 Annual Report," here are some key steps in starting the service that have been accomplished:
  • Amtrak has committed that equipment will be available when the service begins.
  • A System Safety Plan was submitted to the Federal Railroad Administration.
  • An agreement was reached on operating cost sharing among the three states. Minnesota and Wisconsin will each contribute 35% of the operating cost not covered by fares, Illinois will contribute 30%.
  • Agreements approved between Amtrak and Ramsey County.
And here's what is left to be done, with the (positive) caveat that literally all of the service agreements couldn't be finalized until Ramsey County & Amtrak finalized the SPUD agreements. Commissioners have indicated that the other agreements should be finalized fairly quickly now, though I'm not holding my breath with how long it actually takes. Feels like these dominoes could fall in only a week or two, or it could take a month. It's also great that the route/service plan is nearly complete.
  • A route and service plan (nearly complete).
  • Service Agreements between Amtrak and Canadian Pacific (the owner of the rail line), between Amtrak and the states of Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Illinois, the owner of St. Paul Union Depot, and between Wisconsin and the Federal Railroad Administration.
Finally, once again, "Once agreements are executed we eagerly wait for the announcement of the start date," per the GRRC email, so conceivably there is nothing else to do except for the nearly completed route/service plan and signing the above agreements. Closer and closer!
 
Official announcement from the GRRC about the operating and lease agreements for SPUD between Ramsey County & Amtrak being approved earlier this week: https://www.greatriverrail.org/post/amendments-approved-second-train-launch-date-closer

For those keeping track, per the GRRC's email this morning that functioned as their "2023 Annual Report," here are some key steps in starting the service that have been accomplished:
  • Amtrak has committed that equipment will be available when the service begins.
  • A System Safety Plan was submitted to the Federal Railroad Administration.
  • An agreement was reached on operating cost sharing among the three states. Minnesota and Wisconsin will each contribute 35% of the operating cost not covered by fares, Illinois will contribute 30%.
  • Agreements approved between Amtrak and Ramsey County.
And here's what is left to be done, with the (positive) caveat that literally all of the service agreements couldn't be finalized until Ramsey County & Amtrak finalized the SPUD agreements. Commissioners have indicated that the other agreements should be finalized fairly quickly now, though I'm not holding my breath with how long it actually takes. Feels like these dominoes could fall in only a week or two, or it could take a month. It's also great that the route/service plan is nearly complete.
  • A route and service plan (nearly complete).
  • Service Agreements between Amtrak and Canadian Pacific (the owner of the rail line), between Amtrak and the states of Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Illinois, the owner of St. Paul Union Depot, and between Wisconsin and the Federal Railroad Administration.
Finally, once again, "Once agreements are executed we eagerly wait for the announcement of the start date," per the GRRC email, so conceivably there is nothing else to do except for the nearly completed route/service plan and signing the above agreements. Closer and closer!
Thanks for finding/posting this. Those are some big hurdles which were cleared. Not that any of them were likely to become an impass and kill or jeopardize the TCMC itself, but instead the sorts of nagging issues which can make things drag out. And when seemingly-inevitable things drag out there's always a chance for some unexpected torpedo to blow things up....some funding hits an expiration date, a new pandemic, an unexpected lawsuit, a bombshell merger or bankrupcy of some key party, a big political regime change, etc. It's massively easier to survivie those sorts of things if you're already operating versus if you aren't.

I think there's every reason to be optimistic for an annoucement in the next several weeks...
 
Thanks for finding/posting this. Those are some big hurdles which were cleared.
You are welcome, and I agree! So, so much easier for this service to survive future shocks if it just...gets...running! And once it does, barring catastrophe or equipment shortages, the positive side of me thinks it's going to put up gangbusters ridership numbers, just far beyond what was forecast. The pent-up demand for the 2nd frequency in this regional corridor is probably greater that of any other corridor in the nation, save the Pennsylvanian, which I'd guess has somewhat similar dynamics.

So, even just having 6-9 months of smooth operation and good ridership would go a long, long way towards it not being abruptly cut due to, cough, potential political regime changes. Will also be VERY important in showing MN lawmakers--who will have to approve new operating funds once the first two years of funds are used--that state-supported Amtrak service is, well, actually worth supporting.
 
What will train numbers be ? 9 & 10 ?

Not too likely in my opinion -- those were North Coast Hiawatha numbers, and given the fairly shot of restoring that I doubt they'd tie those up. Plus low digits are not generally used for state-supported routes.

Much more likely, if uninspired, is use of the exiting Hiawatha numbers the TCMC will be an expansion of. Westbound would be 334, the 11am CHI-MKE trip. Eastbound would be 340, the MKE-CHI arriving at 7:14pm.
 
What was the North Star's numbers when running just between St Paul and Duluth in the 1980's ?

Maybe then 834 and 840. Oklahoma trains are 821 & 822.

Right now, the two Hiawatha sets make a total of 7 round trips per day, each swap their overnight positions between Chicago and Milwaukee.

I assume the TCMC will get 2 of its own trainsets since they need a cafe car and not to be Ventures, leaving the 2 Hiawatha trains sets doing 6 round trips per day. Be interesting as to how that will affect overnight lay up positions.

Interesting that Illiois is paying 30%. I would have assumed for the portion beyond Milwaukee that Wisconsin and Minnesota would each pay 50% and Illinois nothing.
 
What will train numbers be ? 9 & 10 ?
Just a WAG ?
Reference this LINK:
http://kevinkorell.com/btn/numt0001.htm

There is already a 337 and 338 between Chicago-Milwaukee-Chicago
An extension of that existing route - TCMC

The existing Chicago Milwaukee could use 337 - 300 hundred series from the Hiawatha Chicago Milwaukee
the 7 a stub section of from the Empire Builder
338 - 300 hundred series from the Hiawatha Milwaukee Chicago
the 8 a stub section of from the Empire Builder

Or simply just throw something new against the wall and see if it sticks !

Not my job to blow the horn AND NAME TRAIN TRIPS but should it jump the tracks - I am to blame ! LOL !
 
What was the North Star's numbers when running just between St Paul and Duluth in the 1980's ?

This may only be a partial history based on some quick combing of timetimes on The Museum of Amtrak Timtables website -- anybody else feel free to jump in :)

Empire Builder ran CHI-MSP-HVR-SEA as 7 + 8
North Coast Hiawatha ran CHI-MSP-BIL-SEA as 9 + 10
Arrowhead ran MSP-DLH as 760 + 761

In later 1977 or early 1978 the Empire Builder and North Coast Hiawatha were combined into a single daily train CHI-MSP, alternating via the Havre route as Empire Builder four days per week as 7 + 8, and via the Billings rout three days pwer week as 17 + 18

The second CHI-MSP train continued to use 9 + 10 but only ran as far as MSP and was billed the Twin Cities Hiawatha.
Arrowhead contined MSP-DLH.

The wtihn about a year in 1978 the CHI-MSP Twin Cities Hiawatha was combined with the Arrowhead to operat daily CHI-MSP-DLH using 9 + 10 and billed as the North Star. That name...and the legacy numbers 9 + 10 interited from when the second CHI-MSP train was the NCH, continued on even as the train was truncted from CHI-MSP-DLH to just being daily MSP-DLH in 1981, and then prior to being shut down in 1985 it only ran MSP-DLH on the weekends.

So there IS history of 9+10 being used on CHI-MSP even as that second CHI-MSP train no longer headed west on the NCH route. Still kind of doubtful they pull that back here, but you never know. If the NCH every does come back it's questionable if these particluar CHI departure and arrival times would be the ones continuing to (or from) the NCH routing, but who knows if that's even on their minds.

I did find it kind of cool that Amtrak did indeed for a short time use Twin Cities Hiawath for a local CHI-MKE-MSP train. Maybe history will repeat itself.

1711165240920.png
 
This may only be a partial history based on some quick combing of timetimes on The Museum of Amtrak Timtables website -- anybody else feel free to jump in :)

Empire Builder ran CHI-MSP-HVR-SEA as 7 + 8
North Coast Hiawatha ran CHI-MSP-BIL-SEA as 9 + 10
Arrowhead ran MSP-DLH as 760 + 761

In later 1977 or early 1978 the Empire Builder and North Coast Hiawatha were combined into a single daily train CHI-MSP, alternating via the Havre route as Empire Builder four days per week as 7 + 8, and via the Billings rout three days pwer week as 17 + 18

The second CHI-MSP train continued to use 9 + 10 but only ran as far as MSP and was billed the Twin Cities Hiawatha.
Arrowhead contined MSP-DLH.

The wtihn about a year in 1978 the CHI-MSP Twin Cities Hiawatha was combined with the Arrowhead to operat daily CHI-MSP-DLH using 9 + 10 and billed as the North Star. That name...and the legacy numbers 9 + 10 interited from when the second CHI-MSP train was the NCH, continued on even as the train was truncted from CHI-MSP-DLH to just being daily MSP-DLH in 1981, and then prior to being shut down in 1985 it only ran MSP-DLH on the weekends.

So there IS history of 9+10 being used on CHI-MSP even as that second CHI-MSP train no longer headed west on the NCH route. Still kind of doubtful they pull that back here, but you never know. If the NCH every does come back it's questionable if these particluar CHI departure and arrival times would be the ones continuing to (or from) the NCH routing, but who knows if that's even on their minds.

I did find it kind of cool that Amtrak did indeed for a short time use Twin Cities Hiawath for a local CHI-MKE-MSP train. Maybe history will repeat itself.

View attachment 36272
Excellent history to resurrect the old train numbers !!!!!

Using the LINK I posted earlier train numbers 9 & 10 are still open for assignment.

Interesting to note that train #9 was scheduled to leave CHI 11:40 am arrive MSP 8:35 pm
----- 7 hours and 55 minutes
Today's #7 scheduled to leave 3:05 and arrive 10:56 pm
----- 7 hours and 51 minutes
Same route stops - a difference of 4 minutes on paper ***
*** of course on paper and reality don't jive - those freight trains changing the timely equation !


I remember in the early 80's taking many trips to Duluth on the North Star with my fellow employees
$26.00 round trip with Lunch on a Launch (boat) tour of the St. Louis river harbor - and later a tour
of the Glensheen (murder) Mansion and a on your own dime dinner at the top of the Radisson.
Then the trip back to cities - what a great outing !
Oh to do that again and again - - - there was a Cafe car but we where well fed before that.
The closest thing to that in later years were the few charter trips on the 261 steam excursions (261.com)
 
Looks like TCMC is now available for booking in the reservation system starting 22 May.
Hmm! Interesting...very very interesting on multiple counts. 1. They said the name Borealis was being retracted and replaced. 2. It was also said (for the last half-year!) that the start of service would be at least a month after the official service announcement (it's been crickets since March 20th) and obviously the 22nd is quite soon. So, I wonder if the 22nd is in there as a test or if they've decided to start it without very much promotion, which doesn't feel ideal. Stakeholders were very worried about a limited timeline for promotion.

However, it's clear they are very close--the Great River Rail Commission has an agenda item tomorrow on Inaugural TCMC Event Planning, as well as an update from Greg Mathis, the MnDOT rep, on the TCMC.
 
Amtrak has the website for the TCMC service up, which apparently will (again, despite protestations to the contrary after the name first came out--they said It was "retracted") be named the Borealis! Hat tip to Ian Gaida on Bluesky. https://www.amtrak.com/borealis-train
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top