State Funded trains are on time more?

Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum

Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

frequentflyer

Conductor
Joined
Jun 10, 2008
Messages
1,213
I have a theory that state funded trains are more on time than LD trains, because the Railroads aren't afraid of Amtrak CEOs , but are deftly afraid of public seeking no nothing bureaucrats and state lawmakers looking for a camera. Intentionally delay a train that a state tax payers are directly funding and you get the wrong type of attention.
 
That could be a factor, but there are other reasons as well. For example, state trains are shorter than LD trains in length. In addition, many are relatively new and were built with the permission of freight railroads as track improvements were developed to accommodate the new service.
 
I have a theory that state funded trains are more on time than LD trains, because the Railroads aren't afraid of Amtrak CEOs , but are deftly afraid of public seeking no nothing bureaucrats and state lawmakers looking for a camera. Intentionally delay a train that a state tax payers are directly funding and you get the wrong type of attention.
You can play around with some links on "ASMAD" - an archive of Amtrak Status Maps on-time performance. Average OTP by train number, entire route, service disruptions, etc.

https://juckins.net/amtrak_status/archive/html/home.php
 
Yes, State supported (403b) trains are shorter. But if UP were to routinely stab the Capitol trains in California someone is Sacramento is firing a letter or email to Omaha.
 
There is no 403(b) anymore. That act is defunct. Now they are all PRIIA Section 209 trains.

The CalDOT deal with UP was put together by Gene Skorposwski before he moved to Brightline in Florida. It included a significant dollop of additional money and a credible incentive structure for UP to come to heel purely as a business savvy move. UP does not stab Capitol trains because it is sufficiently hurtful to them contractually to do so.
 
I don't find the on-time performance of the Cascades to be anything great. Overall for the last year, they're only on-time 55%, and one of the trains serving my area (#516) boasts a mere 23% on-time performance.
 
The CalDOT deal with UP was put together by Gene Skorposwski before he moved to Brightline in Florida. It included a significant dollop of additional money and a credible incentive structure for UP to come to heel purely as a business savvy move. UP does not stab Capitol trains because it is sufficiently hurtful to them contractually to do so.
Now that sounds like the kind of guy that Amtrak director's should have recruited.....looks like they let another good one slip away....
 
The CalDOT deal with UP was put together by Gene Skorposwski before he moved to Brightline in Florida. It included a significant dollop of additional money and a credible incentive structure for UP to come to heel purely as a business savvy move. UP does not stab Capitol trains because it is sufficiently hurtful to them contractually to do so.
Now that sounds like the kind of guy that Amtrak director's should have recruited.....looks like they let another good one slip away....
He has since retired from Brightline, after getting the first service up and ready to go. I had a long chat with him in Chicago at the RPA Spring Meeting. Delightful gentleman to talk to.
 
I had a nice talk with him at the opening of Brightline (fun story about spelling names there). Agreed.

By the way, he used to work for Amtrak. I forget his exact title.

The big issue is that Amtrak isn't really in a position to offer those incentives. There's actually an amusing problem in VA (well, when you're not dealing with it) where CSX will stab a Regional for a VRE train because VRE offers better incentive payments. They'll also occasionally stab an LD train for a Regional, though that's somewhat less common if only because there are less chances for it to happen.
 
I have a theory that state funded trains are more on time than LD trains, because the Railroads aren't afraid of Amtrak CEOs , but are deftly afraid of public seeking no nothing bureaucrats and state lawmakers looking for a camera. Intentionally delay a train that a state tax payers are directly funding and you get the wrong type of attention.
They aren't. The fact is that the state lawmakers can make a big fuss over delays to LD trains too, and I've seen them do it.

What I see is that trains which run on state-owned tracks are more on time than trains which run on freight-owned tracks, because ownership is powerful. Even when the freight railroad dispatches the tracks, knowing that the state can revoke the dispatching contract is a huge, huge stick.

The CalDOT/UP deal seems to be an unusual case where the freight railroad still owns the tracks but the state has enough of a contractural stick.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top