Rail Freak
Engineer
What do "Heat Problems" mean?
Thanx
Thanx
It would help to know how it was used.What do "Heat Problems" mean?
Thanx
That has been a problem at times with the Rail Runner commuter train here in the ABQ area.because rails expand in the heat, trains must operate slower (which causes delays).
My Cat has Heat Problems! :lol: :lol:It would help to know how it was used.What do "Heat Problems" mean?
Thanx
There is a 'fix' for that!My Cat has Heat Problems! :lol: :lol:It would help to know how it was used.What do "Heat Problems" mean?
Thanx
Also the TRE communiter train in Dallas/Ft Worth IE: Route(s) Affected: TRE Update, 8/9, 3pThat has been a problem at times with the Rail Runner commuter train here in the ABQ area.because rails expand in the heat, trains must operate slower (which causes delays).
Then instead of problem with the rails, it may mean problems with her nails!My Cat has Heat Problems! :lol: :lol:It would help to know how it was used.What do "Heat Problems" mean?
Thanx
At this time of year and with the teemperatures being what they are, we are talking about the rails being hot. Steel expands and contracts with temperature changes, or tries to. With welded rail, it cannot, so when the weather gets cooler the rail is in tension. When the rail gets hotter, it is in compression. That means in hot weather the rail wants to push out sideways to relax the force. This sideways push is resisted by the ties and ballast. When it does turn loose and move sideways it usually happens under a train because the shaking of the track makes it easier for it to move. Therefore, when it gets really hot speed is reduced for two reasons: First and foremost to reduce the force the train puts into the track so that it is below what it would take for the track to turn loose and buckle. Second, with the speed being low, if it does turn loose, the train will be less likely to derail.What do "Heat Problems" mean?
Thanx
Or if it does still manage to derail, at least the impact on the passengers will be considerably less and therefore fewer major injuries. Also less damage to the equipment should it derail.Second, with the speed being low, if it does turn loose, the train will be less likely to derail.
Do they (should they?) put expansion joints into welded rails to handle this?With welded rail, it cannot, so when the weather gets cooler the rail is in tension. When the rail gets hotter, it is in compression.
Expansion joints are what you have with stick rail as it's called, or un-welded rail. The very act of welding removes the expansion joint and provides a better ride that reduces wear on the rail and on the wheels of the cars & engines. Welding gets rid of the traditional clickity-clack that trains made famous.Do they (should they?) put expansion joints into welded rails to handle this?With welded rail, it cannot, so when the weather gets cooler the rail is in tension. When the rail gets hotter, it is in compression.
I wonder if there is a recording of the "clickedly-clack" that one could download into one's Ipod? :lol: That way you'd have the best of both worlds!Stick rail or un-welded tail gave what was the "clickedly-clack" and the bouncy ride, whenever the wheels hit those expansion joints. While I miss that noise, I'll tale the smoother ride.!
No, NO, a thousand times NO!Expansion joints are what you have with stick rail as it's called, or un-welded rail. The very act of welding removes the expansion joint and provides a better ride that reduces wear on the rail and on the wheels of the cars & engines. Welding gets rid of the traditional clickity-clack that trains made famous.Do they (should they?) put expansion joints into welded rails to handle this?With welded rail, it cannot, so when the weather gets cooler the rail is in tension. When the rail gets hotter, it is in compression.
This is not to say that all expansion joints are removed; switches require joints, signals, bridges, etc. And after 2 or 3 miles of welded rail it becomes necessary to simply put in a joint if none of the above things have happened to break things up.
Does that mean that Allen could be wrong?No, NO, a thousand times NO!Expansion joints are what you have with stick rail as it's called, or un-welded rail. The very act of welding removes the expansion joint and provides a better ride that reduces wear on the rail and on the wheels of the cars & engines. Welding gets rid of the traditional clickity-clack that trains made famous.Do they (should they?) put expansion joints into welded rails to handle this?With welded rail, it cannot, so when the weather gets cooler the rail is in tension. When the rail gets hotter, it is in compression.
This is not to say that all expansion joints are removed; switches require joints, signals, bridges, etc. And after 2 or 3 miles of welded rail it becomes necessary to simply put in a joint if none of the above things have happened to break things up.
Expansion joints are completely and absolutely unnecessary with a couple of very rare exceptions, such as in approach to the draw spans in draw bridges.
Rail can be welded up for an essentially infinite length. You do not need to break things up every 2 or 3 miles or any other interval. In fact, once you get past a few hundred feet it does not matter how long the section is. Sliding friction keeps all but the end 300 feet or so from moving. I can think of quite a few examples where the rails are continuous for over 100 miles.
You can weld up through turnouts. It is done.
Insulated joints are now normally glued so that they do not move, either.
You would be surprised (or maybe not) how many engineer-type can't grasp the stress-strain concept with CWR. They say, "but you have to let it expand somewhere, don't you?" That's when I say, "don't quit your amps and volts job."No, NO, a thousand times NO!Expansion joints are what you have with stick rail as it's called, or un-welded rail. The very act of welding removes the expansion joint and provides a better ride that reduces wear on the rail and on the wheels of the cars & engines. Welding gets rid of the traditional clickity-clack that trains made famous.
This is not to say that all expansion joints are removed; switches require joints, signals, bridges, etc. And after 2 or 3 miles of welded rail it becomes necessary to simply put in a joint if none of the above things have happened to break things up.
Expansion joints are completely and absolutely unnecessary with a couple of very rare exceptions, such as in approach to the draw spans in draw bridges.
Rail can be welded up for an essentially infinite length. You do not need to break things up every 2 or 3 miles or any other interval. In fact, once you get past a few hundred feet it does not matter how long the section is. Sliding friction keeps all but the end 300 feet or so from moving. I can think of quite a few examples where the rails are continuous for over 100 miles.
You can weld up through turnouts. It is done.
Insulated joints are now normally glued so that they do not move, either.
I dunno, never heard of the guy.Does that mean that Allen could be wrong?
He probaly never heard of you either!I dunno, never heard of the guy.Does that mean that Allen could be wrong?
He probaly never heard of you either!I dunno, never heard of the guy.Does that mean that Allen could be wrong?
If you want to visit the place where the residents never make any mistakes, visit a cemetary.Allen could be wrong, but Alan rarely is!He probaly never heard of you either!I dunno, never heard of the guy.Does that mean that Allen could be wrong?
hboy: :blush: :giggle:
Spoken like a true engineer. And that is a compliment.If you want to visit the place where the residents never make any mistakes, visit a cemetary.Allen could be wrong, but Alan rarely is!He probaly never heard of you either!I dunno, never heard of the guy.Does that mean that Allen could be wrong?
hboy: :blush: :giggle:
Enter your email address to join: