west point
Engineer
It sounded like the rear loco was idle running. If so probably to supply HEP ?
By “delivered”, do they mean it’s in Toronto? Seems awfully quick to get there.
But they look super nice, I didn’t realize the picture was real at first. I much prefer VIA’s cab over Amtraks.
From a different forum:My interpretation is that it’s just now finished at Siemens’ factory in Sacramento, and is/will be en route to Toronto. Granted, I may be wrong, but some context from VIA would be nice to clarify.
If they come through Michigan to get to the corridor, I know I’ll be heading out to see them.
https://groups.io/g/Canadian-Passenger-Rail/message/92650The VIA set has departed Turner Illinois on Sept 28 0156 am.
Turner is a control point (CP) where Union Pacific's ex-Chicago & North Western main line to Omaha crosses the Canadian National's single track Elgin, Joliet & Eastern in West Chicago.
I hope they tested the potable water system for lead.From the article:
TORONTO — The first portion of VIA’s C$989 order for 32 Siemens Charger trainsets has arrived in Canada.
I'd say that Canada got a great deal!
Here is the start of a twitter thread with some interior photos of the first trainset.
Haven't Amfleets and most new commuter cars had them for ages now? Perhaps not as bright as the ones on the Acelas, but still....In way past times all those green lights might be mistaken for rear marker lights or even front markers? especially on curves.
Yes though I think most are red. The Amfleets and the Metro-North cars are.Haven't Amfleets and most new commuter cars had them for ages now? Perhaps not as bright as the ones on the Acelas, but still....
Even when doors are closed and brakes released ?Yes though I think most are red. The Amfleets and the Metro-North cars are.
Ah, you're right. I was mixing up the door indicators and the brake indicators in my head. The Amfleets and MNRR cars have green brake release indicators like the Siemens video above, and red door indicators above each door that's open.Even when doors are closed and brakes released ?
For everyone that agrees with you, there are likely an equal number who will like it the way it is. There are benefits to both arrangements. Some airlines will go as far as alternating single business class seats with side tables to offer both options.Anyone else think it odd that in Business Class they put the single seat not next to the window but against the aisle? I'd rather have the side table between me and the aisle.
Airline seats that do that often has to do with finding enough space for accommodating the legs in the lie flat position without increasing the row pitch beyond a certain point. The Polaris pods on United are an example of that.For everyone that agrees with you, there are likely an equal number who will like it the way it is. There are benefits to both arrangements. Some airlines will go as far as alternating single business class seats with side tables to offer both options.
So that passengers passing by the corridor accidentally knock over your drink - or trip and fall over your side table?Anyone else think it odd that in Business Class they put the single seat not next to the window but against the aisle? I'd rather have the side table between me and the aisle.
So that passengers passing by the corridor accidentally knock over your drink - or trip and fall over your side table?
That is almost inevitable on a common carrier which allows people to move around en-route. However, how do you want to avoid that people use the seats as reference points when navigating across the car and therefore miss the tripping hazard posed by your side table? I’m not saying your idea is stupid, but I can see very good reasons (e.g. passenger safety) for discarding it…Or conversely, bump into your shoulder.
Enter your email address to join: