This is the car that can change everything. Good news!The first baggage-dorm car, 69002, is deadheading north on 98 today. No, it isn't going back to the factory. Looks like it is starting a training/familiarization tour.
This is the car that can change everything. Good news!The first baggage-dorm car, 69002, is deadheading north on 98 today. No, it isn't going back to the factory. Looks like it is starting a training/familiarization tour.
This is the car that can change everything. Good news!
Yes...all ten of them.
This is probably the most important and consequential car of the order. Yeah, I still don't understand that stupid decision to go with more baggage cars which are now being ELIMINATED on some trains (e.g., 448). This just doesn't make sense. Someone on this site once said "Amtrak only needs 11 single level full service diners to outfit the Silver Meteor, Crescent and Lake Shore". If that's the case I guess the same applies to baggage/dorms. It won't take long to see how adding these cars is going to effect the bottom line of these trains.
I think Amtrak is really going to regret reducing the number of bag/dorms and
that decision infuriates me. What the **** were they thinking? Am I overreacting?
You're not overreacting at all: I feel the same way.This is probably the most important and consequential car of the order. Yeah, I still don't understand that stupid decision to go with more baggage cars which are now being ELIMINATED on some trains (e.g., 448). This just doesn't make sense. It won't take long to see how adding these cars is going to effect the bottom line of the trains to which they are assigned.
I think Amtrak is really going to regret reducing the number of bag/dorms and
that decision infuriates me. What the **** were they thinking? Am I overreacting?
Right, because the present bike program is so accommodating.I heard the decision was made to add space for additional bike storage due to the popularity of the bike aboard program.
I heard the decision was made to add space for additional bike storage due to the popularity of the bike aboard program.
It also had to do with mail contracts, some of which came to fruition, some didn't.
USPS Attorney General? Did you mean Inspector General?I thought that was the main reason and a serious possibility after it was recommended by the USPS Attorney General if I remember right, but I never heard that anything came of it. Did Amtrak actually secure any mail contracts?
USPS Attorney General? Did you mean Inspector General?
The US mail no longer uses Amtrak and United States Post service has sold all their rail/mail facilities.
I expect a full training and familiarization tour anyway, if only to show everyone the details of the new bedroom and accessible bedroom. It didn't take that long for the baggage cars, so whatever.I hope that it means that since the car is half bag and half sleeper, when the full sleeper emerges, a training and familiarization tour will not be necessary.
After all, everyone is already trained on the baggage portion.
At least they describe getting the cars in service as a priority. I think many of us had the feeling that they didn’t really care about the order anymore.If you look at the budget asks for the Viewliner II program you can sort of guess the it will be 2021 before the V-2 deliveries are completed and paid for. Unfortunately.
At least they describe getting the cars in service as a priority. I think many of us had the feeling that they didn’t really care about the order anymore.
The quick mention of “lease and/or storage” as an option for how to deploy the V2s, though, is slightly infuriating.
The US mail no longer uses Amtrak and United States Post service has sold all their rail/mail facilities.
So what is it $25 to bring your bike? Wouldn't the roomettes bring in more like thousands?I heard the decision was made to add space for additional bike storage due to the popularity of the bike aboard program.
I thought it was Gunn who killed all remaining postal business when he got rid of all other non-passenger business other than limited retaining of package business. His claim was that it cost more to run that business than the revenue it produced.
Enter your email address to join: