The Amtrak Southwest Chief Coalition has the beginnings of a website.
"Save the Chief! is the motto," said Mayor Joe Reorda of Trinidad. That is what Amtrak President and CEO Joseph Boardman made clear to a group of stockholders gathered aboard his special train while it was on a siding at the La Junta station on Saturday morning.
Why do you think that they'd end service? A reroute seems like a minor step compared to killing an entire train line.I'm becoming convinced that Boardman's position is current route or end of service.
I read some more in-depth analysis from surveys: when teens are asked why they're not getting licenses, it looks like it's about 1/3 "prefer not to drive", 1/3 "can't afford to drive", and 1/3 "can't be bothered, other priorities".
20-I read some more in-depth analysis from surveys: when teens are asked why they're not getting licenses, it looks like it's about 1/3 "prefer not to drive", 1/3 "can't afford to drive", and 1/3 "can't be bothered, other priorities".
OK Smart Alec. Gonna ride All Aboard Florida or the Saratoga and North Creek?Hell yeah, I can't wait for that new private LA to Vegas service to start! I'm totally riding that train!Where real markets are for rail passenger service, private business will enter.
Well, I wrote him to tell him that would be a terrible idea. You can write him too.I'm becoming convinced that Boardman's position is current route or end of service.
Might look like that at first. In fact, it would be the last straw which would cause me to leave the country permanently. Am I important? No. Am I representative? Yes.Quite frankly, long distance trains can be completely eliminated in this country, and but for a few thousand jobs, and few more thousand having to find "another way", it will be but a blip in the national scheme of things.
As a resident of Texas I just gotta tell ya' that due to the current Political Climate here and with the Republican Candidates that are sure to win ( died in the wool Conservatives to the kookiest of the wing nuts) all the State Wide offices and the State Leg and Senate, there won't be any money appropriated to support Amtrak! We'll be lucky to keep the Eagles and the Heartland Flyer! I'm not sure of LA but their Gov and Leg is of a similar bent IINM??Amtrak is not going to start new long distance service without states along the way providing some support. That is the reason The Sunset Limited east of New Orleans has not returned. Rerouting the Southwest Chief through Wichita and Amarillo is starting a new long distance route. I haven't heard that Kansas and Texas have come up with any funds to support that route. I agree with GML that Amtrak will eliminate the Southwest Chief and operate the Texas Eagle/Sunset route daily from Chicago to Los Angeles with feeder train from New Orleans to San Antonio (if they get some state support from LA and TX). That will free up a whole bunch of Superliners and locomotives to support the other western long distance trains. Since no new western long distance cars or locomotives are being built, this will help alleviate some of the problems as the equipment gets older.
Nathaniel, I respect your intelligence, your drive, and your insight greatly- more than almost anyone else here I don't know personally. But you have a serious case of Quixotitis. I am far too involved with issues closer to my house to spend too much time on the Chief.Well, I wrote him to tell him that would be a terrible idea. You can write him too.I'm becoming convinced that Boardman's position is current route or end of service.
You're perfectly welcome to Google it yourself.Would somebody find and post the congressional bill that started Amtrak. I ask question---Could it be that Amtrak Board is in violation of congressional mandate by not reestablishing national service on the Sunset Limited?
No. Why should it?IRS has said two years of no profits the third year of no profits you will be classified as a hobby . --should not this apply to Amtrak and its routes?
I appreciate your passion, but pardon me for sounding cynical. Where would you go? Most countries don't have wide open borders like ours. As much of a Jim Hudson loving right winger TEA party wacko I am, I've had plentyto keep me disgusted over the past 6 years. But I can't find a single country where I can go and enjoy the freedoms and opportunities I enjoy here.Might look like that at first. In fact, it would be the last straw which would cause me to leave the country permanently. Am I important? No. Am I representative? Yes.Quite frankly, long distance trains can be completely eliminated in this country, and but for a few thousand jobs, and few more thousand having to find "another way", it will be but a blip in the national scheme of things.
NY-Chicago and NY-Miami matter. (If NY-Chicago goes away, I'm leaving.)
You might consider Canada and Australia if you have to leave the US, most like us even if the taxes are high and basicaly are Socialist mixed with Capitalism but both are lovely countries!!!I appreciate your passion, but pardon me for sounding cynical. Where would you go? Most countries don't have wide open borders like ours. As much of a Jim Hudson loving right winger TEA party wacko I am, I've had plentyto keep me disgusted over the past 6 years. But I can't find a single country where I can go and enjoy the freedoms and opportunities I enjoy here.Might look like that at first. In fact, it would be the last straw which would cause me to leave the country permanently. Am I important? No. Am I representative? Yes.Quite frankly, long distance trains can be completely eliminated in this country, and but for a few thousand jobs, and few more thousand having to find "another way", it will be but a blip in the national scheme of things.
NY-Chicago and NY-Miami matter. (If NY-Chicago goes away, I'm leaving.)
SHHH!And my friend Venture Forth isn't as T-party like as he pretends,(just like I'm not totally a Socialist)
I agree, God bless imperfect America! (I fuss about or more commonly try to avoid politicians, but I do love our nation.)The only countries I could see myself moving to are Singapore, Hong Kong, or Canada. Europe is a tax and financial mess, and I don't want to be stolen from to pay for years of bad government policies.
That being said, I don't see myself ever leaving the US. No country has provided more opportunity, and lifted more people out of poverty than America. I wouldn't want to move to another country where my taxes would double or triple, where starting a business is hard, and where everything is much more expensive. Sure, the US may not have the best rail system in the world, but I hardly think that rail should be the primary factor for wanting to move elsewhere. When you weight the pros vs. the cons, there simply isn't a better place to be in the world.
Railpac in California is saying the exact opposite: http://www.railpac.org/2014/07/09/sunset-limited-in-jeopardy-is-serious-business-part-1-comments-by-railpac-member-steve-roberts/ (note citation Ryan)Amtrak is not going to start new long distance service without states along the way providing some support. That is the reason The Sunset Limited east of New Orleans has not returned. Rerouting the Southwest Chief through Wichita and Amarillo is starting a new long distance route. I haven't heard that Kansas and Texas have come up with any funds to support that route. I agree with GML that Amtrak will eliminate the Southwest Chief and operate the Texas Eagle/Sunset route daily from Chicago to Los Angeles with feeder train from New Orleans to San Antonio (if they get some state support from LA and TX). That will free up a whole bunch of Superliners and locomotives to support the other western long distance trains. Since no new western long distance cars or locomotives are being built, this will help alleviate some of the problems as the equipment gets older.
That's nice.(note citation Ryan)
Enter your email address to join: