15,000 points for a roomette. 25,000 for a bedroom.This is going to be real simple (I hope?) How much is a one zone redemption from Chicago to Dallas NOW?
Last edited by a moderator:
15,000 points for a roomette. 25,000 for a bedroom.This is going to be real simple (I hope?) How much is a one zone redemption from Chicago to Dallas NOW?
Maybe not downgraded to "Fourth City", but "Third City" for quite some time.Ah, ok, thanks for the clarification. Because, you know, "4th city" just isn't funny!When I said 4th biggest, I was talking about the city I live in (Houston), not the one you do.
Exactly, the old program is still in place for some time, and that really is cool. Just try to plan your 2016 trips by late January. I do like the fact that there is a grace period to use the older zone awards. I plan to do two or three trips under the old system in 2016.Keep in mind that you only have to RESERVE by January 24th, not travel - so really you could book now for travel next summer, under the existing rules.Sadly, we are unable to spare the time to take one last points-only LD trip before the new redemption schedule kicks-in. We'll hang on to the points, of course, and use them next year, even if they're worth half what they were.
It is if, as was the earlier original postulation, you were using minimums and "cheap point runs" repetitively to fund cross-country travel in a "gamed" way.So, you see, it isn't entirely essential to have lots of corridor service or daytrips available to benefit by the minimum point system. Shoot, I WISH I could take Amtrak to NOL or SAS at those prices. I'd be doing it often.
15,213 of Cincinnati's 2.1 million metro residents get on their 3x a week train in the middle of the night vs 6.3 million in Houston to produce 20,603 boardings in the afternoon/evening. Your boardings seem in line with an area that is indifferent to rail service when push comes to shove(canceled replacement of HOS station with intermodal center, lack of OH 3 C's cooridor service funding).Yes, it would be wonderful if everyone had hub level service for their preferred transit option in their town with a no congestion route to the terminal. The reality is we don't. Feel free to can chew out your legislative reps and tell them to fund trains. I have 8 daily departures instead of just 1 each direction from a LD train because IL and MO legislatures make it so.Are we very dense? Not particularly. Do we have the 4th highest population, with no other Amtrak stops in the metro area? Yes.
So from a "Number of people calling Houston their home Amtrak Station" standpoint, what difference does it make if we're stacked vertically, or horizontally?
As Jack Benny, famously, answered as to why his age so long remained the same, "There's nothing funny about forty!"Maybe not downgraded to "Fourth City", but "Third City" for quite some time.Ah, ok, thanks for the clarification. Because, you know, "4th city" just isn't funny!When I said 4th biggest, I was talking about the city I live in (Houston), not the one you do.
Oh, I don't think that was my point at all. Rather, the context was, entirely, that maximum point earnings is, most appropriately, rewarded for riding and spending cash directly on Amtrak service and that anything done to encourage such spending (such as the 100 point minimum) is good.The service levels in HOS are an admitted aside, to the main point that was being refuted (even non-hubs can make point runs), and used to illustrate that most people outside of hubs have little if any practical way to take meaningful advantage of "minimum points" runs to make a substantial difference in their AGR balances.
Sure. I suppose one of the keys is that the people who care enough to do stuff like this often encourage other people to ride Amtrak who otherwise might not. However, I do get that those who often try to maximize points through promotions might not necessarily be the most profitable customers.Oh, I don't think that was my point at all. Rather, the context was, entirely, that maximum point earnings is, most appropriately, rewarded for riding and spending cash directly on Amtrak service and that anything done to encourage such spending (such as the 100 point minimum) is good.The service levels in HOS are an admitted aside, to the main point that was being refuted (even non-hubs can make point runs), and used to illustrate that most people outside of hubs have little if any practical way to take meaningful advantage of "minimum points" runs to make a substantial difference in their AGR balances.
I received one a couple of days ago.Anyone else get the luggage tag? It contains my name/address and says "RIDE ON" on the bottom with the AGR logo.
It came really nicely packaged too, on folded thick printed card stock, a cardboard band with a gold-colored seal saying "THE FUTURE OF AMTRAK Guest Rewards" and a note with my name describing the 2016 version of AGR. The envelope is printed with "Celebrating 15 years". I wonder how much they spent on these.
Frankly I don't know if it really matters, since I'm probably not going to renew Select Plus.
A luggage tag? Is that supposed to make us feel better?Anyone else get the luggage tag? It contains my name/address and says "RIDE ON" on the bottom with the AGR logo.
It came really nicely packaged too, on folded thick printed card stock, a cardboard band with a gold-colored seal saying "THE FUTURE OF AMTRAK Guest Rewards" and a note with my name describing the 2016 version of AGR. The envelope is printed with "Celebrating 15 years". I wonder how much they spent on these.
Frankly I don't know if it really matters, since I'm probably not going to renew Select Plus.
"We know you're not taking your bags anywhere with us anymore, but if you need to know whose bags are in the closet..."... :giggle:A luggage tag? Is that supposed to make us feel better?
Yeah - I was trying to be subtle in my snark.A luggage tag? Is that supposed to make us feel better?
True this! Priceless!Hope they send me SWA Tag!!!!
Impressive! Are you laying over in any cities, or riding the "tin can" straight thru?Well, last night we booked our "Farewell to Amtrak Guest Rewards Tour" for late April and early May 2016.
We will be doing: ORL-NYP (Silver Meteor #98) --> NYP-NOL (Crescent #19) --> NOL-CHI (City of New Orleans #58) --> CHI-LAX (Southwest Chief #3) --> LAX-SLM (Coast Starlight #14) --> SLM-LAX (Coast Starlight #11) --> LAX-SAN (Pacific Surfliner) ---- all in bedrooms (except the Surfliner which will be BC).
Total cost of the trip would be $7,069.00 if we paid in cash. This cost just 123,500 points under the "old" AGR structure including points back from Chase figured in there. Under the "new" AGR structure this trip would cost a horrific 243,881 points... ALMOST DOUBLE!!!!!!!
It looks like I will still have over 100,000 points left in my account even after this when things transition over. We will be deciding to keep them for whatever minimal travel we will still do with Amtrak -- or transfer them out and use them for hotels or air travel.
Impressive! Are you laying over in any cities, or riding the "tin can" straight thru?Well, last night we booked our "Farewell to Amtrak Guest Rewards Tour" for late April and early May 2016.
We will be doing: ORL-NYP (Silver Meteor #98) --> NYP-NOL (Crescent #19) --> NOL-CHI (City of New Orleans #58) --> CHI-LAX (Southwest Chief #3) --> LAX-SLM (Coast Starlight #14) --> SLM-LAX (Coast Starlight #11) --> LAX-SAN (Pacific Surfliner) ---- all in bedrooms (except the Surfliner which will be BC).
Total cost of the trip would be $7,069.00 if we paid in cash. This cost just 123,500 points under the "old" AGR structure including points back from Chase figured in there. Under the "new" AGR structure this trip would cost a horrific 243,881 points... ALMOST DOUBLE!!!!!!!
It looks like I will still have over 100,000 points left in my account even after this when things transition over. We will be deciding to keep them for whatever minimal travel we will still do with Amtrak -- or transfer them out and use them for hotels or air travel.
Enter your email address to join: