Just curious, what made you think they're rebuilt Amfleet II's? Just the shininess?ah gotcha, I must mislooked, I was in hurry that's why. But again, thanks.
Just curious, what made you think they're rebuilt Amfleet II's? Just the shininess?ah gotcha, I must mislooked, I was in hurry that's why. But again, thanks.
Shine, fresh black paint, brand new wheels. No I don’t have information about these cars, but yeah from the photo they came back from a heavy shop visit.Just curious, what made you think they're rebuilt Amfleet II's? Just the shininess?
Oldest of these cars are 8 years old. Perhaps it is time for them a get a refresh of the livery vinyl stickersFunny. My wife just took the Meteor from Florida to New York (continuing onto Boston) and I was really surprised at how bad the "new" Viewliner equipment is looking. Really shabby.View attachment 31896
It wasn't just the stickers. The Viewliner II car exteriors looked surprisingly worn as did the engines. On the other hand I am often impressed how good the Superliners still look and they are much older.Oldest of these cars are 8 years old. Perhaps it is time for them a get a refresh of the livery vinyl stickers
They do get washed a little more often than the Viewliners for several years now too.It wasn't just the stickers. The Viewliner II car exteriors looked surprisingly worn as did the engines. On the other hand I am often impressed how good the Superliners still look and they are much older.
Is that a sleeper or baggage car?Funny. My wife just took the Meteor from Florida to New York (continuing onto Boston) and I was really surprised at how bad the "new" Viewliner equipment is looking. Really shabby.View attachment 31896
Of course that was for the prestigious name trains. If you were riding the unnamed #397 local to Podunk, you might be riding in a beat up un air conditioned heavyweight coach from the 1920's.There was a time when some Class 1 railroads felt the need to replace their top trains equipment in only 11 years, to be competitive.
Hence both the prewar 1938 streamlined Broadway Limited, and Twentieth Century Limited got all new equipment in 1949…
If only Amtrak could do that today…
That was the baggage but the train had two Viewliner II sleepers and those looked pretty bad too. One sleeper had some kind of heavy streak stains coming off the roof and covering the windows and side. They certainly didn't look like "new" equipment and it doesn't seem that Amtrak is taking good care of them at least cosmetically.Is that a sleeper or baggage car?
And if they’re short on crews to take the trains through.Well the Chicago yard wash rack was/is out of service. Last weekend, track work in and around the building.
Trying to wash equipment anywhere is always a challenge. Effort and time need to pull the a train set into a wash bay.
Very easy step to skip if the train is running late.
This is very positive news. From what I've read elsewhere, it seems they asked about a variety of sleeper types but not anything resembling a 4 or 6-berth common European trains. Not complaining about that, just putting out there for consideration. I would love a lie-flat option!So apparently Amtrak has an active survey out there right now asking AGR members their opinions on different types of future sleeper accommodations including airline style lie-flat seats.
(No link available)
Didn't that 11-year-old equipment just get demoted to some 2nd tier train which had really old equipment?There was a time when some Class 1 railroads felt the need to replace their top trains equipment in only 11 years, to be competitive.
Hence both the prewar 1938 streamlined Brroadway Limited, and Twentieth Century Limited got all new equipment in 1949…
If only Amtrak could do that today…
Didn't that 11-year-old equipment just get demoted to some 2nd tier train which had really old equipment?
Where’s the elevator? Any pictures or videos of it? Are they on the surfliners too?For those questioning if elevators will work reliability long term, California Cars all have one in the Cafe for freight. I have no idea if they are passenger rated or what their uptime is like but those cars are now 30 years old.
Where’s the elevator? Any pictures or videos of it? Are they on the surfliners too?
Yes.Didn't that 11-year-old equipment just get demoted to some 2nd tier train which had really old equipment?
Savings in per-passenger CO2 emissions using rail rather than air ... https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=541838Source?
As someone who has thought a lot about using Amtrak as opposed to flying (reasonably) to reduce my carbon footprint, there's not a lot of great information about diesel locomotives vs. airplane emissions. Most of the existing research covers electric trains in Europe or Asia. With that said, I've found other studies that indicate that even beyond 600 miles, there are significant gains in carbon emission reduction.Savings in per-passenger CO2 emissions using rail rather than air ... https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=541838
There are contradictory statements from Europe but then again that’s European rail which is far more electrified meaning less emissions on main lines vs the U.S. where we have continued on Diesel.
On the second statement. I was in error. I had to double check my self well I was taking the weekend. It was a projection made by the original Autotrain in justification for its Midwest line. A line that failed. Though a degree of that failure was Autotrain itself which couldn’t maintain operating the second line due to lack of rolling stock.
Enter your email address to join: