My only comments: Who paid for all of this foolishness?
Anyone ever hear of Seperation of Church and State?
Anyone ever hear of Seperation of Church and State?
Last edited by a moderator:
The same people that pay for everything! All of us!Jim, you need to calm down a bit or you will be old before your time! Nothing you can do about this kind of thing, so why get all worked up?My only comments: Who paid for all of this foolishness?
Anyone ever hear of Seperation of Church and State?
You might be right. I'm surprised that Philadelphia didn't put up more resistance. DC ("Taxation without Representation") *always* resists; perhaps being an occupied territory with no representation tends to make them more instinctively hostile to such stuff. NY has been weirdly compliant with insane security gibberish in recent years, more so than (say) Los Angeles.The cynical theory (and my favorite): The secret service wanted a city to bully and show off its power and thought that Philly would put up less resistance than DC or New York.
When it comes to the "who paid for it" factor... Some folks in the area are a bit perturbed as the City Schools that are in serious serious need of funding and people are pulling the well we can pay for all this BS but we can't pay for our schools????My only comments: Who paid for all of this foolishness?
Anyone ever hear of Seperation of Church and State?
The event (WMOF) paid at least some, and the mayor says almost all the city's costs. The contract calls for reimbursement of police, other city services and a rental charge for the Parkway at an estimated $12 million with the final value determined by invoices submitted to the WMOF by November 1. All the temporary structures for the event were provided and erected by the WMOF. The total cost to the WMOF is estimated at $45 million. I don't doubt that the city, states, and federal government will be on the hook for some of the expenses, but it is not 100%.At least out of the pain of doing an Olympics one gets a bunch of infrastructure. Philly basically got not much that is lasting, other than good feeling out of this, at some significant cost.
Perhaps, but the Olympics are a 2-week long event (or longer, if you count the Paralympics). This was a 2-day event. [The WMOF that preceded the weekend Papal visit doesn't really count, as that was basically a run-of-the-mill conference that large cities like Philly host all the time.]At least out of the pain of doing an Olympics one gets a bunch of infrastructure. Philly basically got not much that is lasting, other than good feeling out of this, at some significant cost.
Looks like Mike had it right.Philadelphia seems to be "over planning" for this event. I don't think they will be getting the big crowds that are anticipated. People will say, "I'm not getting involved in this mess." There are way too may restrictions being put in place.
Chicago hosted Pope John Paul II during Jane Byrne's administration as mayor and the whole city didn't shut down.
Philadelphia is either headed for a disaster or will be a laughing stock when only a few thousand people show up.
That's not what is happening here. The Pope is also a head of state, and any other religious leader of any denomination with a similar popularity would be treated the same way. The fact that he's Catholic really has nothing to do with it.My biggest concern is showing favoritism to one religion over another @_Govt expense
Hey, Jim, how come you changed your name? Afraid of backlash?Thanks to all for the responses! I do understand how the system works!
My biggest concern is showing favoritism to one religion over another @_Govt expense ( Christianity is a minority in today's world)while the various Governments are claiming they're broke and the right wing wants to gut social programs ( and Amtrak!) so as to fund more wars and a bigger security state!
I know the planning for Philly was a Keystone Kops operation, why didn't they just do the whole thing in Washington or New,York in conjunction with a "State" visit as opposed to a strictly Religious event in Phily @ tax payers expense?
In this case, it really is both the principle of the thing and the money!!
The answer, my friend, is blowing in the wind.Hey, Jim, how come you changed your name? Afraid of backlash?
Not really, neither of them are heads of their religions.But what if the Supreme Leader of Iran wanted to shut down a US City to conduct Prayers, or the Kooky for Life Atheist from North Korea wanted to put on a similar rally?
Same difference no?
Nope, it just seemed like a good time to "..shed one more layer of skin.." and to change my name like my favorite poet Robert Zimmerman did!The answer, my friend, is blowing in the wind.Hey, Jim, how come you changed your name? Afraid of backlash?
Agreed. If the city hadn't planned what it did, and there were a few more people, the same people and others would be complaining that the city failed to prepare for every eventuality. Several hundred thousand did show up for the Papal Mass at Franklin Parkway, so it's not like they didn't have large crowds at hand.The event went well, and people from all over the world had a great time. Was it perfect? No. But it was not a "fiasco", nor a "disaster", it didn't make Philly "a laughing stock", and "septic" seemed to fun just fine. None of the outrageous doom-and-gloom, end-of-the-world predictions that appeared on this thread came true. Amen.