Mailliw
OBS Chief
It could also be that service north of Seattle just isn't viable without traffic to Vancouver.No adequate turning facilities?
It could also be that service north of Seattle just isn't viable without traffic to Vancouver.No adequate turning facilities?
That could be. I took the morning train fairly frequently and Mt. Vernon and Bellingham were significantly turnover points (Edmonds and Everett were almost all people just boarding). But usually at Bellingham almost as many people got on as got off. The train was usually about as full arriving Vancouver as it was leaving Everett.It could also be that service north of Seattle just isn't viable without traffic to Vancouver.
Why can’t Amtrak run trains between Seattle and Bellingham until service into Canada resumes…especially if Washington is paying for it?
Because running Seattle to Bellingham requires the same number of Amtrak crews as running to Vancouver.
Probably so…I was thinking in terms of the Vermonter, which ‘replaced’ the Montrealer. Similar? Maybe…It could also be that service north of Seattle just isn't viable without traffic to Vancouver.
I don't think the cases are all that similar. The Montrealer was an overnight train, the Vermonter a day one. The "City of Bellingham" ran on pretty much a similar schedule to the evening north/morning south Vancouver train. IIRC (and it has been a long time), crew availability wasn't the issue for the Montrealer, but schedule reliability and lengthening due to horrendous track conditions.Probably so…I was thinking in terms of the Vermonter, which ‘replaced’ the Montrealer. Similar? Maybe…
Whatever Amtrak's excuse(s), there is no viable way to comprehend how they were selling round trip business class tickets from Bellingham to Portland in February for travel in June, make route familiarity runs and not communicate to ticketed passengers that there are NO PLANS or dates to restart service.
Well, Amtrak crewing isn't going to be the issue there, as it is already running NFL-NYP.What about the Adirondack and Maple Leaf.
The "second train" was a Bellingham turn initially before it was finally extended to Vancouver for the Olympics. They did build a layover track in Bellingham. I don't know if it still exists.
Good for them. Amtrak does need to have its feet held to fire by the States that are being mistreated.
*****************************It could also be that service north of Seattle just isn't viable without traffic to Vancouver.
I agree. This is something that WDOT needs to push and fund. It would be entirely in their bailiwick as far as having it or not goes.*****************************
Yes. no Cascade service north of Seattle and to Vancouver would be huge loss.
I would really like to see an Amtrak station stop in Blaine, WA (former home of country music star Loretta Lynn). There are 870,00 Canadians living south of the Fraser River. The only way they can get on a Cascade train is to double back to Vancouver. Also, same for people living well north of Seattle who want to get to Vancouver, BC. There is a big gap between Bellingham and Vancouver and a Blaine station could help fill that gap.
Blaine has been pushing for it and it makes sense. Although I bet WSDOT would make the City of Blaine and/or Whatcom County pay the lion's share of the costs to build the necessary platform/infrastructure.I agree. This is something that WDOT needs to push and fund. It would be entirely in their bailiwick as far as having it or not goes.
Pacific International did. Cascades didn't. I rode the Cascades from Day One, pretty much. There was a huge gap between the discontinuance of the Pacific International and the initiation of international Cascades service.Looking at Amtrak’s early Pacific International, it stopped at Blaine, WA and White Rock, BC customs stations, although not sure if they were also station stops. They did however, stop for passengers at New Westminster, BC…
Reasonable surmises. Here is an update on the Cascades, from the May 21st All Aboard Washington meeting in Centralia.This is just my opinion and only my opinion. It is speculation based on the previous posts with the letters and the Trains analysis.
First, I am personally quite sure that when Vancouver service is restored it will only be one train, the Seattle-Vancouver 516/519 pair.
Second, while I am a bit less sure if this, I bet that we will not see the Portland-Vancouver train, the 517/518 pair, restored until the Siemens Venture cars are in Cascades service.
Anyone want to take me up on that?
Enter your email address to join: