Richard Anderson replacing Wick Moorman as Amtrak CEO

Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum

Help Support Amtrak Unlimited Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
And painting a bunch Amfleets in strange colors and shapes. What was her name? Barb something?

All very good points Trogdor. I also found it quite hilarious.

Sent from my iPhone using Amtrak Forum
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Since then the ban on tilt on Metro North has been lifted. Now Acelas run with tilt on on the Metro North segment too.
But the tilt is still reduced to 4.2 degrees versus the usual 6.8 degree on that segment, correct?
 
Interesting. So, does Acela run faster than regionals on Metro North?

BTW, I just looked at the title of this thread, and we are WAY off topic.
default_mellow.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Interesting. So, does Acela run faster than regionals on Metro North?
AFAIK no speeds limits were changed. Only comfort enhanced. Acelas and Regionals with similar stopping pattern between NHV and NYP appear to be scheduled for roughly the same running time.
 
Then there was the "Service Guarantee" initiative that cost Amtrak a ton of money and didn't even provide any meaningful way of improving the service (just gave free trips to people who didn't like that the fabric on the seat next to them was torn).
I'm sure that a service guarantee isn't free; but then a business's quality control function isn't free either. When trains are run like a factory without a plant manager or foreman, how else are you going to have any accountability?
 
Back to Richard Anderson and Wick Moorman--

According to Wikipedia, Richard Anderson's father worked for the Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railroad (although as an office worker, not on the rails), so you'd think he'd have more respect for rail in general.

As for Wick, one of his greatest strengths is seeing the good in everyone and truly liking everyone. Perhaps that is also his greatest weakness, and he can't see that perhaps Anderson does not have rail in his heart, just on his balance sheet.
 
In fairness, all CEO's have to look at their balance sheets. Amtrak's best CEO's (Claytor, and, though I will draw fire, Gunn) had a great understanding of their balance sheets. Some of the bad ones (Downs, Warrington) were living in a fiscal fantasy worlds ("glidepath to self sufficiency").

It is the potential "solutions" to the issues in balance sheets where the problems lie. Someone who doesn't understand the business does things like the Mercer cuts under Downs where trying to cut losses results in both more losses and less service. The Mercer cuts were arguably the worst thing that ever happened to the national network and it still hasn't fully recovered and probably never will.

We'll see how Anderson works out and how well he understands that Amtrak isn't an airline and many airline models won't work. Cut the PPCs? Frankly, understandable, they've been hanging by a thread for a long time. Cut special moves and charters? Well, you can make a sound argument about concentrating on your core business. Some of the nonsense about PTC, well, my understanding is he back to "PTC or FRA waiver" now, not just "PTC or death" and I think some grandstanding was involved, so I am reserving judgement on that. The rumors about cutting the LDs into connecting corridor trains? Ummm, no, that would be a bad move and the one I am most afraid of. Encouraging more corridor service, great.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
All of this discussion is great, but at the end of the day, what sort of product is Amtrak selling, and who is going to buy it?

We have to be honest;

  • the delays in getting the Viewliner order completed has cost the company capacity for first class service, which is considerably better profit than coach, and subsidizes the whazoo out of dining car service. How much of this delay is because of the car builder, and how much is Amtrak not pushing completion harder?
  • there's no sign what so ever that Amtrak is even thinking about replacement cars for the Superliners, many of which went into service while I was an undergrad. I'm nearing retirement. They should be too.
  • All of the cuts to local station staffing may not affect ticket sales, but what about creating some connection to the local community? Why not use local agents to make visits to local businesses, schools, etc and market the trains better in small communities? How does it feel to drive up to a dirty, quasi-abandoned rail station in the middle of the night to catch a train that only shows up once a day, with nobody around?
  • Many of the cars of all types are very tired - frayed upholstery, flat cushions, old restrooms, stained walls, etc. Crews are pushed harder every year on the trains, personal service is catch as catch can. Great they did new seat cushions on the coaches for the Northeast, and single level services, but what about the viewliners, Superliners, and stations?
Against that backdrop, it used to be when I booked Amtrak, I could generally travel via sleeper for what it cost to fly in coach, plus a little bit more, but the product was good, predictable, and relaxing. Now days, when I book Amtrak, the cost for a sleeper is many times pretty close to first class airfare, for a much inferior product. Yes, I don't get xray'd and searched on Amtrak, but terminals are well maintained, good food options in terminals, staff is around if something goes wrong, and the majority of airlines offer a consistent product which while not spacious is tolerable for the shorter haul. Fundamentals, like parking near Amtrak stations and knowing menu items will be available in the diner and not sold out immediately seem to be lacking.

I've seen my share of bashing of Gunn in the comments. He may have been impolitic to many, but his attitude of getting the railroad into a state of good repair is missed. It seems now like every change sets off another round of staff reductions. How much of the real understanding of passenger rail is being sacrificed to cover consulting charges. And where is the will of the government to force the railroad industry to treat Amtrak with something vaguely like respect when it tries to make reasonably simple changes like making a 3 day a week train a daily for less than billions of dollars of capital expense?

I have a trip in a week, and this will probably be my last for a while until I see some progress in making the train service better. All the ham fisted cost savings, from eliminating newspapers in sleepers, cutting back meal options, eliminating staff, not replacing old equipment, canceling trains at the drop of a hat for track maintenance, they're all taking away some of what made train travel fun. I hope something happens, that NARP and AARPCO can push for improvements and our congress pushes back. But what I feel is going to happen is that Amtrak in the end wants to be the NEC railroad, and that will not work long run. The system only works if it's national and serves the nation.

There
 
I wasn't following Amtrak during the Downs era, so can't comment on their financial situation at the end, but I have a hard time believing they were burning through cash vs. appropriations at the rate that they would entirely run out of cash three months before the end of the fiscal year / next year's appropriations. That's where Warrington left the company.
You're wrong. They were actually out of cash in 1997 and needed an emergency injection of cash at that time, made by special legislation. Downs had been hiding the railroad's financial condition from Congress, so it came as an unpleasant surprise to them. The Secretary of Transportation had to intervene to get the bailout passed.

Congress's condition for the bailout was the infamous and impossible "glidepath to self-sufficiency" (or Amtrak would be shut down) which Warrington was saddled with before he was even hired. This is the impossible situation which Warrington *entered*. After several years, he left the railroad... financially, exactly where it had been when Downs admitted that he'd run out of money; operationally, much improved, including the Acela. This with a completely hostile Secretary of Transportation, whereas Downs had a friendly Secretary of Transportation and *still* managed to screw everything up.

Gunn just cancelled useful trains and got himself fired. He talked a good game but he didn't really make any improvements before he got fired. (Would he have if he'd stayed? Probably. But he didn't.) The best that can be said is that by talking a good game he convinced Congress that Amtrak needed permanent funding; but Warrington didn't have the *opportunity* to do that. When Warrington came in, the Downs era had been such a disaster that Congress was in no mood to provide permanent funding. Did Warrington lie to Congress? I think he had to, if he wanted Amtrak to continue to exist.

The Downs era was an unmitigated disaster. Warrington gets unfairly tarred for being the guy who came after Downs. It's a pretty normal thing: people blame the current guy for problems which actually started under the last guy.

I wasn't riding Amtrak during the Downs era... there's a reason for that. I barely knew it existed, and it had an entirely bad reputation. Warrington's marketing moves were actually substantially effective and raised awareness.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In fairness, all CEO's have to look at their balance sheets. Amtrak's best CEO's (Claytor, and, though I will draw fire, Gunn) had a great understanding of their balance sheets. Some of the bad ones (Downs, Warrington) were living in a fiscal fantasy worlds ("glidepath to self sufficiency").

It is the potential "solutions" to the issues in balance sheets where the problems lie. Someone who doesn't understand the business does things like the Mercer cuts under Downs where trying to cut losses results in both more losses and less service. The Mercer cuts were arguably the worst thing that ever happened to the national network and it still hasn't fully recovered and probably never will.

We'll see how Anderson works out and how well he understands that Amtrak isn't an airline and many airline models won't work. Cut the PPCs? Frankly, understandable, they've been hanging by a thread for a long time. Cut special moves and charters? Well, you can make a sound argument about concentrating on your core business. Some of the nonsense about PTC, well, my understanding is he back to "PTC or FRA waiver" now, not just "PTC or death" and I think some grandstanding was involved, so I am reserving judgement on that. The rumors about cutting the LDs into connecting corridor trains? Ummm, no, that would be a bad move and the one I am most afraid of. Encouraging more corridor service, great.
I agree 110% with what zephyr17 says. Particularly the Mercer cuts, which were utterly disastrous (perhaps the only comparably bad period was the "1979 Cuts").

Does Anderson understand the economies-of-scale nature of railroading? (More trains per day on the same route, longer trains, etc.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I disagree with your assertion that this will alienate the “best” customers and that this will end up doing more harm than good.

We don’t even know the full extent of what is going to happen, I think that it’s somewhat premature to call those efforts a failure.
I guess, but unassigned seating, free bags, the occasional appearance of a PV, those things help add to the charm of Amtrak.
I don't want my ride on Amtrak to be like an airline. And I don't trust Richard Anderson. I really don't.

Sent from my Moto Z2 Play using Amtrak Forum mobile app
 
I think everyone here can agree that Richard Anderson is trying to make Amtrak profitable at all costs, including ailenating the company's best customers, and in the end doing more harm than good.

Sent from my Moto Z2 Play using Amtrak Forum mobile app
Put me in the "I do not agree" column.
You think he has some redeeming qualities?
Sent from my Moto Z2 Play using Amtrak Forum mobile app

Yes. He has successfully managed several large corporations (not just airlines), and knows how to get companies to be disciplined in their operation (something Amtrak doesn't seem to know how to do).

He also doesn't like the (dying) status quo, which is something I (and many others) have also been frustrated with in recent years.

Amtrak, organizationally, is an absolute mess, and has been for many years. Under Boardman, the company underwent a management restructuring every 2-3 years, with nothing to show for any of them.

Moorman may have been good, but it was obvious he didn't really want the job and never intended to stay.

If Richard Anderson can instill some organizational discipline and consistency, that will be an achievement not seen in decades. Sorry you can't get a Denny's-quality meal or ride around in your 70-year-old private car.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think everyone here can agree that Richard Anderson is trying to make Amtrak profitable at all costs, including ailenating the company's best customers, and in the end doing more harm than good.

Sent from my Moto Z2 Play using Amtrak Forum mobile app
Put me in the "I do not agree" column.
You think he has some redeeming qualities?
Sent from my Moto Z2 Play using Amtrak Forum mobile app
Yes. He has successfully managed several large corporations (not just airlines), and knows how to get companies to be disciplined in their operation (something Amtrak doesn't seem to know how to do).

He also doesn't like the (dying) status quo, which is something I (and many others) have also been frustrated with in recent years.

Amtrak, organizationally, is an absolute mess, and has been for many years. Under Boardman, the company underwent a management restructuring every 2-3 years, with nothing to show for any of them.

Moorman may have been good, but it was obvious he didn't really want the job and never intended to stay.

If Richard Anderson can instill some organizational discipline and consistency, that will be an achievement not seen in decades. Sorry you can't get a Denny's-quality meal or ride around in your 70-year-old private car.
One of my biggest problems is that Amtrak can't have the luxury of operating as a utility. It needs to operate as a business....
Some parts of the status quo I actually like, for instance free bags and unassigned seats. Others, like the drab Amfleets I've come to find dull.

The fact is is that if Richard Anderson is being brought in to rip the soul out of Amtrak, that's something I take issue with. I used to think a rail advocate (and CNW alumnus) from Iowa was nuts. Now I think he's the Bernie Sanders of rail advocates.

Personally, I'm a bit of a socialist to the point I'd be happy to see a nationalized railway system, but that's another deal.

To get to the point: Amtrak is a public service. While it should be a proper steward of federal funds, this notion that Amtrak should be profitable erks me.

NO form of transportation in America is profitable.

Sent from my Moto Z2 Play using Amtrak Forum mobile app
 
Trogdor the Burninator said it better than I could.

Having a PV attached to a train I’m riding in adds absolutely no value whatsoever, and brings with it the risk of making it later. Do Not Want.

I’m also not sure where you’re getting the no free bags thing from. Has there been anything proposed on that, or is this just more of the “some airlines do this, and some of Anderson’s previous jobs were at airlines, so surely it’s coming” logical fallacy that so many are enamored with?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think everyone here can agree that Richard Anderson is trying to make Amtrak profitable at all costs, including ailenating the company's best customers, and in the end doing more harm than good.

Sent from my Moto Z2 Play using Amtrak Forum mobile app
Put me in the vehemently do not agree column.

Which best customers do you speak of? The ones that pay less than 1% of Amtrak’s revenues? [emoji57]

Sent from my iPhone using Amtrak Forum
 
I disagree with your assertion that this will alienate the “best” customers and that this will end up doing more harm than good.

We don’t even know the full extent of what is going to happen, I think that it’s somewhat premature to call those efforts a failure.
I guess, but unassigned seating, free bags, the occasional appearance of a PV, those things help add to the charm of Amtrak.
I don't want my ride on Amtrak to be like an airline. And I don't trust Richard Anderson. I really don't.

Sent from my Moto Z2 Play using Amtrak Forum mobile app
That is fine. But it is a huge leap from that to believing that everyone agrees with you.

Sent from my iPhone using Amtrak Forum
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top