Scott Orlando
Service Attendant
https://www.orlandosentinel.com/new...OXrDqmel68Bl9yz9qJZtaX2VsrwVNYwZp9uP6RNSiCMTI
Answering my own question….
Answering my own question….
Last edited:
This is going to be a HUGE problem as the schedule increases. I can't believe they are going to have so many grade crossings.Well, this is in the news again.
3 Brightline train crashes in 4 days in Palm Beach County (wptv.com)
It's simply a matter of cost of removing the existing crossings (No new crossings opened on the mainline for the Brightline service) vs the costs of the disruptions that collisions cause.This is going to be a HUGE problem as the schedule increases. I can't believe they are going to have so many grade crossings.
This was on the existing trackage. I think all of the crossings on the new double trackage north of WPB are getting 4-quadrant gates, which will make it impossible for cars to go around unless they crash through a gate.Perhaps more aggressive anti-car measures -- spikes, bollards rising out of the ground, etc. -- are the way to go.
This was on the existing trackage. I think all of the crossings on the new double trackage north of WPB are getting 4-quadrant gates, which will make it impossible for cars to go around unless they crash through a gate.
I believe they were also talking about intrusion detectors, but I don't know whether they were installed or if so how extensively.In my view this is at best a temporary fix as they don't remove the problem of people stopping on the tracks, which tends to happen especially if there is an intersection adjacent to the rail crossing.
Certainly removing grade crossing improves safety. But it also hurts public relations where citizens (and first responders) get mighty testy about adding a couple miles to their journey. The problem is almost all psychological - people are engrained with the belief that as soon as the red lights start flashing, they will be stuck for 10 minutes. I commend CSX for grade separation and almost no grade crossings along their route in this area. FEC was a 2nd tier rail carrier. They didn't have the need to reduce crossings with the few trains they had.
I've actually seen in Japan where they were able to raise the tracks above the grade to remove crossings. I've also seen them completely move a track underground - both of these tasks without ever stopping service. Talk about expensive. But they deemed it worthwhile. In the meantime, Darwin will have his pick of the litter.
There are a few relevant grant programs under the FRA and FHA:I believe that in Japan there is actually a fund for this type of thing and local municipalities can somehow apply for money for this type of project.
There is also an opportunity for Brightline to capture an entirely new ridership base, if the railroad is willing to add a specific new line of service.
I believe they were also talking about intrusion detectors, but I don't know whether they were installed or if so how extensively.
Intrusion detection systems might work in cases where vehicles get stuck on the tracks. But it seems most collisions are the result of people trying to race the train and the race ending in a tie.
If a vehicle is detected on the tracks when the gate on the exit side of the crossing closes, is there enough time for the PTC to stop the train before reaching the crossing? In the onboard camera video of this accident, it took 30 seconds from the time the car entered the tracks until full stop. There's some engineer reaction time in there, and I don't know whether he went into full emergency braking.I think all of the crossings on the new double trackage north of WPB are getting 4-quadrant gates, which will make it impossible for cars to go around unless they crash through a gate.
I don't recall hearing that Brightline plans to upgrade crossings on the existing trackage to quad gates. The max speed on that segment is only 79 mph, while they've announced a max speed of 110 mph on at least parts of the trackage now being upgraded between WPB & Cocoa.It doesn’t look like there were quad gates at that crossing. While it certainly doesn’t absolve the driver of any guilt and it won’t completely eliminate all collisions, I do think the local MPOs should look at funding improvements at crossings without quad gates and also fencing.
Quad gates and fences is the answer to this problem. And perhaps photo equipment at the most notorious crossings.
I assume that's a rhetorical question. Yes, they are.Shouldn't the people who live along the Brightline tracks realize by now that taking a chance may cost your life. Are all these people really that stupid?
Enter your email address to join: