People should still look. Look, listen, live.4 teenagers in a car with the radio going who couldn't hear the train horn being killed.
People should still look. Look, listen, live.4 teenagers in a car with the radio going who couldn't hear the train horn being killed.
CBS2 in Chicago just said it was 2 people in the dump truck and only 1 on the train that were killed. Not 1 in the truck and 2 on the train. I wonder which is correct.
How about drivers just have some common sense?
Tight lock couplers prevented the couplers from climbing over each other and causing more damage. They prevent severe vertical displacement between the couplers as well as reducing the possibility of jackknifingIf they werent like that could only one or two cars have toppled instead? Or does having more go down limit the number of potential rolls?
In even a minor low speed derailment where the cars remain upright and apparently undamaged, like the derailment backing up over sand awhile ago at Palm Springs, the cars must have all running gear and brake rigging minutely inspected before they can be moved at more than minimum speed or carry passengers.Maybe a bit insensitive at the moment? But the cars that toppled, will they just get a crane and put them back on the tracks to see if they still roll?
RIP!3 dead, two on the train one one in the truck
YupOn a practical note, is Amtrak not already facing a serious shortage of usable SuperLiner equipment?
There were 2 Boy Scout troops on the SWC. Coming home from camp.NBC Nightly News reported a few minutes ago that two killed were passengers on the train. The truck driver died. According to the news report, the driver ended up in a ditch nearby the accident. A Boy Scout was nearby (for some reason) and tried to provide some comfort to the person before he passed.
Common sense is in very short supply these days. Has the good Lord had supply chain issues in installing this in recent generations?
Wow, that Train is usually Full in the Summer in both directions.There were 2 Boy Scout troops on the SWC. Coming home from camp.
There was also a group of High School Students from Kansas on the train.Wow, that Train is usually Full in the Summer in both directions.
...and some people will still try to beat out the train....Unfortunately, given the state of the American people today, we're probably going to need the arms, bells, and whistles at every crossing.
It hasn't been such a hot day for people traveling in private cars, either.It's been a bad day for public transportation in the last two days. The Amtrak issue on the West Coast, the SWC's derailment, and the Norwegian Sun's striking a growler trying to visit the Hubbard Glacier.
I believe the state or local jurisdiction bears the responsibility to pay for upgrades to existing crossings, not the railroad.There has to be at some point in this country a reckoning of the monetary value of a single life. As described in previous posts, the intersection of tracks and many roads in this area are not at right angles. The BNSF must know this. I wonder how many similar accidents have occurred in this area.
The design of these crossings and lack of extra means to view trains from hard to view angles are the ingredients of a lawsuit imho.
Per CNN, the 2 troops were from Appleton, Wisconsin with 8 adult leaders. They were on their way back home for the Philmont Scout Ranch in New Mexico. None of them were hurt (thank goodness) and they assisted other passengers who needed help. National headquarters is trying to arrange transportation to get them home as soon as possible.There were 2 Boy Scout troops on the SWC. Coming home from camp.
BNSF made $6B last year. Why should the state (aka state tax-holders) be responsible?I believe the state or local jurisdiction bears the responsibility to pay for upgrades to existing crossings, not the railroad.
My understanding is that, as with drawbridges over waterways, much depends upon which came first: The highway or the railroad? Caveat: I Am Not A Lawyer.I believe the state or local jurisdiction bears the responsibility to pay for upgrades to existing crossings, not the railroad.
While I was working for Oregon DOT, a Southern Pacific freight hit a school bus at 20 mph on the secondary West Side line. The school bus driver had stopped, then pulled in front of the train. As a result, outraged public demanded and got crossing gates on the access to a mobile home park. The state and railroad money came by deleting a crossing project with a more likely chance of an accident.And what would be wrong with that? In my opinion, running 90 mph passenger trains on tracks that cross unprotected grade crossings is crazy. The world you seek has long ago passed.
The decision to not install any protective devices is strictly a monetary decision. Railroads have proven recently with PSR that the only god that they worship is wall street. Edit: And I know BNSF is the only class 1 not to go the PSR route, but still they worship the investor. Not the safety of their employees or passengers on their tracks.
Enter your email address to join: