west point
Engineer
More likely that there is concern that an unforeseen incident will change equipment availability.
Each tunnel bore is planned to take 18 months. In 3 years who knows what the equipment situation will be? Then again Amtrak might discover something when doing bores 1 & 2 that requires them to do bores 3 & 4?It’s also very possible they will revert to normal ops when the tunnel work is done. Though I hope they’d consider keeping the cap on single level equipment
Cutting it back to WAS-TPA-MIA.Can someone catch me up on why people think the Star is getting truncated to Washington please, and for how long? I don't understand why Amtrak would cut themselves back from 2 NY-FL trains to just one.
What issues would those be?Each tunnel bore is planned to take 18 months. In 3 years who knows what the equipment situation will be? Then again Amtrak might discover something when doing bores 1 & 2 that requires them to do bores 3 & 4?
You cannot book it past a certain day north of WAS.Can someone catch me up on why people think the Star is getting truncated to Washington please, and for how long? I don't understand why Amtrak would cut themselves back from 2 NY-FL trains to just one.
SM is single-level, so no problem. Running a new route takes a long negotiation, though I guess temporary diversions take place out west. Most East Coast ports drive a lot of freight rail traffic.If the issue is the new tunnel project in Baltimore, why not just have the SS skip Baltimore? After all, freight trains don't go through the Amtrak Baltimore tunnels. And also, how is the SM getting through the tunnels?
It is not about Baltimore. It is about East River Tunnel in New York.If the issue is the new tunnel project in Baltimore, why not just have the SS skip Baltimore? After all, freight trains don't go through the Amtrak Baltimore tunnels. And also, how is the SM getting through the tunnels?
jb
incidentally providing a single seat ride between Midwest and the Atlantic Coast down to Florida.
The latest rumor that I have heard even has a train number associated with the new through train. So I think it will be a through train, though as with everything Amtrak, you never know for sure until the proverbial "Fat lady sings".
I think a "Capitol Star" would be the smart way to do it, but Amtrak might well decide to run the consist through but not the passengers, keeping them as two separate services.
I suppose the crews could remain the same. Wouldn’t be the worse thing to have the OBS crew change at Washington. Although certainly more efficient if the crew ran through as total trip time not that much different than a 2 night western train. Perhaps something innovative (not likely) with half crews out of Chicago and other half from Miami.Would there be union issues to running it through? Like which crew base gets the jobs on a "Capitol Star"? Miami/Hialeah or Chicago?
That could also help explain why the current ARROW changes to the Star are only sales blocks WAS-NYP and not a change to truncating 91/92 to WAS. If an entirely "new" train is replacing it, it makes sense to just block sales to points not served on the "old" but leaving it intact until the "new" service is opened within the system. Then transfer existing reservations on 29/30 and 91/92 to the "new" train.The latest rumor that I have heard even has a train number associated with the new through train.
Kinda hope it would be one crew for the whole trip out of Miami/Hialeah, because the Star is staffed for Traditional Dining and maybe Traditional would return WAS-CHI in that case.I suppose the crews could remain the same. Wouldn’t be the worse thing to have the OBS crew change at Washington. Although certainly more efficient if the crew ran through as total trip time not that much different than a 2 night western train. Perhaps something innovative (not likely) with half crews out of Chicago and other half from Miami.
If it is indeed a through train between Miami and Chicago I have my doubts that it will EVER be on time.The latest rumor that I have heard even has a train number associated with the new through train. So I think it will be a through train, though as with everything Amtrak, you never know for sure until the proverbial "Fat lady sings".
What's going on with the East River Tunnel? Since there are 4 East River Tunnel tracks in 2(?) tunnels, why does that make it necessary to truncate the SS?It is not about Baltimore. It is about East River Tunnel in New York.
But if I believe all the evidence that I see it is about through running with Capitol Limited which releases a bunch of Superliners for places where they have better utility and incidentally providing a single seat ride between Midwest and the Atlantic Coast down to Florida.
Well, it looks very much like it will be a single consist in any case, whether or not they sell through tickets on it. So it will have the same timekeeping attributes either way.If it is indeed a through train between Miami and Chicago I have my doubts that it will EVER be on time.
jb
This:What's going on with the East River Tunnel? Since there are 4 East River Tunnel tracks in 2(?) tunnels, why does that make it necessary to truncate the SS?
jb
They are shutting down one of the bores for major maintenance, drastically reducing capacity.Each tunnel bore is planned to take 18 months. In 3 years who knows what the equipment situation will be? Then again Amtrak might discover something when doing bores 1 & 2 that requires them to do bores 3 & 4?
OK boys and girls. The East River tunnel bores are very similar to the North river tunnel bores as both were constructed at the same time by the PRR. East River opened September 1910 and North river opened November 1910. Each East River bore is separate from the others and have no cross connection that would be required under today's fire codes. The tunnel bores are numbered 1 - 4 north to south . The track numbers are not the same as the tunnel numbers.What's going on with the East River Tunnel? Since there are 4 East River Tunnel tracks in 2(?) tunnels, why does that make it necessary to truncate the SS?
jb
IMO, the biggest loss is the loss of checked baggage to/from NYP & intervening stations.WAS-NYP has no shortage of trains. Losing that segment of the only long distance service in the country that has more than one train a day, a segment with no lack of alternative rail connections, isn't exactly the end of the world. Northeast Corridor Florida bound passengers, and vice-versa, can probably adjust.
Right. Whereas 29 currently connects to the Southwest Chief or the other western trains, I'm doubtful the new train will be able to.Well, it looks very much like it will be a single consist in any case, whether or not they sell through tickets on it. So it will have the same timekeeping attributes either way.
At 2046 miles it'll be in the same distance/time range, though a couple hundred miles shorter, as the western LDs at 2200-2400 miles. I imagine the timekeeping will be similar to those as it will have about the same level of exposure to enroute difficulties.
It's also got fairly bad times at NYP, leaving before 7 am and arriving after 10 pm.I am surprised the Cardinal did not also get the axe north of DC. With its miniature consist, it is low hanging fruit, and never was a big passenger hauler when it was larger.
Enter your email address to join: